Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01669811
NCT01669811
Completed
Phase 3

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Comparative Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of D961H 20 mg Twice Daily Oral Administration and D961H 20 mg Once Daily Oral Administration in Patients With Refractory Reflux Esophagitis

AstraZeneca1 site in 1 country1,398 target enrollmentAugust 2012

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Esomeprazole (D961H) twice daily
Conditions
Refractory Reflux Esophagitis
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Enrollment
1398
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Participants With Healing of RE Who Were Graded "O" at Week 8 Out of Participants Who Were Graded "A" to "D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a phase 3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of esomeprazole (D961H) 20 mg twice daily and esomeprazole (D961H) 20 mg once daily in patients (in the form of esomeprazole magnesium salt) with refractory reflux esophagitis after 8 weeks of standard Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy by assessment of presence/absence of inflammation (esophagitis) at Week 8 according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification

Detailed Description

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study to compare the efficacy and safety of D961H 20 mg twice daily oral administration and D961H 20 mg once daily oral administration in patients with refractory reflux esophagitis

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2012
End Date
May 2014
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
  • Patients with RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D by Endoscopy despite of at least 8-week treatment using standard doses of PPIs.
  • Patients must fulfill at least one of the following criteria such as (i) RE with LA grade C/D at Endoscopy on visit 1 and/or history of RE with LA grade C/D, (ii) RE was diagnosed more than 1 year before visit
  • Patients who are able to complete the Patient Diary

Exclusion Criteria

  • Male or female aged less than 20 years at the time of informed consent.
  • Patients with current evidence of the gastrointestinal diseases/conditions such as esophageal stricture to interfere with the evaluation of the study etc
  • Gastric or duodenal ulcer verified by Endoscopy within 12 weeks before randomisation.
  • Previous esophageal, gastric or duodenal surgery except simple closure of perforated ulcer, simple endoscopic treatment with simple operation etc
  • Current or historical evidence (within 12 weeks prior to randomisation) of the diseases/conditions as judged to interfere with the evaluation of the study.

Arms & Interventions

D961H 20mg twice daily

Double-blinded

Intervention: Esomeprazole (D961H) twice daily

D961H 20mg once daily

Double-blinded

Intervention: Esomeprazole (D961H) once daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants With Healing of RE Who Were Graded "O" at Week 8 Out of Participants Who Were Graded "A" to "D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification

Time Frame: 8 Weeks

Percentage of participants with healing of reflux esophagitis (RE) who were graded "O" (No RE) at Week 8 out of participants who were graded "A" (least severe) to "D" (most severe) at baseline according to Los Angeles classification

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Difficulty of Swallowing at Week 4(4 Weeks)
  • Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Sleep Disturbance at Week 4(4 Weeks)
  • Percentage of Participants With Healing of RE Who Were Graded "O" at Week 4 Out of Participants Who Were Graded "A" to "D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification(4 Weeks)
  • Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Heartburn at Week 4(4 Weeks)
  • Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Abdominal Pain at Week 4(4 Weeks)
  • Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Acid Regurgitation at Week 4(4 Weeks)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials