MedPath

Compare D961H 20 mg Bid and 20 mg qd in Patients With Refractory Reflux Esophagitis (Inflammation of Lower Esophagus)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Refractory Reflux Esophagitis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01669811
Lead Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Brief Summary

This is a phase 3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of esomeprazole (D961H) 20 mg twice daily and esomeprazole (D961H) 20 mg once daily in patients (in the form of esomeprazole magnesium salt) with refractory reflux esophagitis after 8 weeks of standard Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy by assessment of presence/absence of inflammation (esophagitis) at Week 8 according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification

Detailed Description

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study to compare the efficacy and safety of D961H 20 mg twice daily oral administration and D961H 20 mg once daily oral administration in patients with refractory reflux esophagitis

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1398
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
  2. Patients with RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D by Endoscopy despite of at least 8-week treatment using standard doses of PPIs.
  3. Patients must fulfill at least one of the following criteria such as (i) RE with LA grade C/D at Endoscopy on visit 1 and/or history of RE with LA grade C/D, (ii) RE was diagnosed more than 1 year before visit 1.
  4. Patients who are able to complete the Patient Diary
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Male or female aged less than 20 years at the time of informed consent.
  2. Patients with current evidence of the gastrointestinal diseases/conditions such as esophageal stricture to interfere with the evaluation of the study etc
  3. Gastric or duodenal ulcer verified by Endoscopy within 12 weeks before randomisation.
  4. Previous esophageal, gastric or duodenal surgery except simple closure of perforated ulcer, simple endoscopic treatment with simple operation etc
  5. Current or historical evidence (within 12 weeks prior to randomisation) of the diseases/conditions as judged to interfere with the evaluation of the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
D961H 20mg twice dailyEsomeprazole (D961H) twice dailyDouble-blinded
D961H 20mg once dailyEsomeprazole (D961H) once dailyDouble-blinded
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Healing of RE Who Were Graded "O" at Week 8 Out of Participants Who Were Graded "A" to "D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification8 Weeks

Percentage of participants with healing of reflux esophagitis (RE) who were graded "O" (No RE) at Week 8 out of participants who were graded "A" (least severe) to "D" (most severe) at baseline according to Los Angeles classification

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Sleep Disturbance at Week 44 Weeks

Cumulative percentage of participants who had sustained resolution (defined as at least 7-day consecutive symptom free) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom -sleep disturbance at Week 4 (on Day 29) based on the Kaplan-Meier method.

Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Abdominal Pain at Week 44 Weeks

Cumulative percentage of participants who had sustained resolution (defined as at least 7-day consecutive symptom free) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom -abdominal pain at Week 4 (on Day 29) based on the Kaplan-Meier method.

Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Acid Regurgitation at Week 44 Weeks

Cumulative percentage of participants who had sustained resolution (defined as at least 7-day consecutive symptom free) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom -acid regurgitation at Week 4 (on Day 29) based on the Kaplan-Meier method.

Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Difficulty of Swallowing at Week 44 Weeks

Cumulative percentage of participants who had sustained resolution (defined as at least 7-day consecutive symptom free) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom -difficulty of swallowing at Week 4 (on Day 29) based on the Kaplan-Meier method.

Percentage of Participants With Healing of RE Who Were Graded "O" at Week 4 Out of Participants Who Were Graded "A" to "D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification4 Weeks

Percentage of participants with healing of reflux esophagitis (RE) who were graded "O" (No RE) at Week 4 out of participants who were graded "A" (least severe) to "D" (most severe) at baseline according to Los Angeles classification

Cumulative Percentage of Participants Who Had Sustained Resolution of GERD Symptom -Heartburn at Week 44 Weeks

Cumulative percentage of participants who had sustained resolution (defined as at least 7-day consecutive symptom free) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom -heartburn at Week 4 (on Day 29) based on the Kaplan-Meier method.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Research Site

🇯🇵

Yufu-shi, Japan

Research Site
🇯🇵Yufu-shi, Japan

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.