Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Dental Caries Class v

• Registration Number: NCT04053530
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

The study will be conducted to assess the marginal integrity of different types of restorations (ketac ™ N100 - ketac™ Universal and bulk fill flowable composite) in class v restoration using USPHS criteria.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2019-08-04
• Study First Submitted: 2019-08-08
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-08-09
• Study First Posted: 2019-08-12
• Primary Completion: 2020-08-03
• Study Completion: 2020-10-15
• Status Verified: 2021-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-01-25
• Last Update Posted: 2021-01-27

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 63

Inclusion Criteria

1. Presence of at least one carious buccal cervical lesion.
2. The absence of tooth mobility.
3. Presence of contact with opposite teeth without any abnormal occlusion stress for the selected teeth.
4. Accessible isolation and observable and easily accessible gingival margins during tooth restoration.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with poor oral hygiene.
2. The presence of any para functional habit.
3. Abnormal occlusion.
4. Any regurgitation problem.
5. Subjects with compromised medical history.
6. Pulpitis, non-vital or endodontically treated teeth.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
is marginal integrity of restoration.	12 months	Primary outcome is marginal integrity of restoration. It will be assessed by USPHS; score will be recorded according to USPHS criteria (Nassar et al., 2014).; 1. MARGINAL INTEGRITY; Alpha (A) Visual inspection and explorer The explorer does not catch when drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth, or, if the explorer does not catch, there is no visible crevice along the periphery of the restoration.; Bravo (B) Visual inspection and explorer The explorer catches and there is visible evidence of a crevice, which the explorer penetrates, indicating that the edge of the restoration does not adapt closely to the tooth structure. The dentin and/or the base is not exposed, and the restoration is not mobile.; Charlie (C) Explorer The explorer penetrates crevice defect extended to the dentino-enamel junction.; Delta (D) Mobile, fractured or missing restoration in a part or total

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Cairo university; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt

Cairo University; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt