Submucosa/Mucosal Pharyngeal Flap Trial

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
• Interventions: Procedure: Standard of Care Pharyngeal Flap; Procedure: Mucosa/submucosa Pharyngeal Flap

• Registration Number: NCT03187600
• Lead Sponsor: Lawson Health Research Institute

Brief Summary

The investigators want to compare two different surgical techniques for the treatment of a condition called velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). VPD is a condition in which the nasal part of the airway does not close properly during speaking and feeding. The current standard surgical management involves taking a pharyngeal flap from the back of the throat comprised of muscle and overlying mucosal tissue to create a functioning valve. The proposed technique would use only the mucosal/submucosal layer of the pharynx for the flap. This technique has been shown to be effective in animal models and it is hoped that it will lead to faster healing, lower complications and improved functional outcome for patients.

Detailed Description

Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) results from failure of the airway to close and separate the oropharynx and nasopharynx during speech, eating and drinking as a result of insufficiency of the velum (soft palate) (1). VPD leads to a number of symptoms including difficulty with articulation, nasal regurgitation and excess nasal air emissions. VPD can often be treated through speech language therapy alone, however when refractory to this treatment surgical correction of problematic anatomy is indicated (2). The current surgery of choice at this center is a pedicled, posterior wall pharyngeal flap. During this procedure a small flap comprised of mucosa, submucosa and superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle is pedicled via surgical dissection and attached anteriorly to the inadequate soft palate. This creates an incomplete midline obstruction at the level of the velum allowing for a dynamic valve which can be closed through the medial constriction of the pharyngeal muscles during speech and eating/drinking. While this surgery has a high success rate there can be a high degree of post operative pain and sub-optimal lateral wall motion (2). It is hypothesized that the suboptimal lateral wall motion post-operatively is due to intentional segmentation of the superior constrictor muscle during the operation. Due to the necessary de-innervation of the pedicled pharyngeal flap there is evidence that the muscle atrophies and the bulk it initially adds to the flap is lost over time. Despite this, patients typically have good long-term outcomes with a pharyngeal flap (3,4). For these reasons it has been postulated that a successful surgery could be carried out using a pharyngeal flap comprised only of mucosa and submucosa, sparing the superior constrictor muscle. By sparing the superior constrictor muscle the investigators hope to achieve a decrease in post operative pain, complications and improved lateral wall motion while maintaining the effectiveness of the flap and symptomatic improvement. This novel surgical approach to treating VPD was shown to be effective and safe in animal trial (2). The major concern of the mucosal/submucosal flap procedure was that the flap would atrophy and fail without the inclusion of the muscular portion. However, results of the animal study comparing the standard pharyngeal flap to the experimental flap, indicated that at 12 weeks post-operation, bulk loss in the muscosa/submucosa group was not significantly greater than bulk loss in the muscular flap group.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-06-11
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-06-13
• Study First Posted: 2017-06-15
• Study Start: 2017-07-18
• Status Verified: 2017-08
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-08-23
• Last Update Posted: 2017-08-25
• Primary Completion: 2020-06-10
• Study Completion: 2020-06-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction undergoing pharyngeal flap surgery for correction.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients suffering VPD secondary to a syndrome. Patients undergoing a revision pharyngeal flap surgery.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Standard of Care	Standard of Care Pharyngeal Flap	Procedure: a superiorly based pharyngeal flap surgery as per Hogan and Cable and Canady. It is performed trans-orally under general anesthetic. The soft palate is divided midline to visualize the posterior pharyngeal wall. A small flap is dissected via longitudinal incisions with a superior pedicle from the posterior pharyngeal wall at the level of the velum. The flap is then brought anteriorly, the inferior portion is lined with mucosa from the nasal portion of the soft palate and sutured in-place to create an incomplete pharyngeal obstruction that acts as a dynamic valve. Nasal stents are placed in each lateral port to prevent airway compromise and maintain flap integrity. Stents are removed two days post operatively and the patient is discharged after removal of stents and deemed to have a stable airway. Dissection will be carried out to the level of the prevertebral fascia and be comprised of mucosa and pharyngeal muscle.
Experimental Group	Mucosa/submucosa Pharyngeal Flap	Procedure: a modified superiorly based pharyngeal flap surgery as per Hogan and Cable and Canady. It is performed trans-orally under general anesthetic. The soft palate is divided midline to visualize the posterior pharyngeal wall. A small flap is dissected via longitudinal incisions with a superior pedicle from the posterior pharyngeal wall at the level of the velum. The flap is then brought anteriorly, the inferior portion is lined with mucosa from the nasal portion of the soft palate and sutured in-place to create an incomplete pharyngeal obstruction that acts as a dynamic valve. Nasal stents are placed in each lateral port to prevent airway compromise and maintain flap integrity. Stents are removed two days post operatively and the patient is discharged after removal of stents and deemed to have a stable airway. Dissection will be carried out only to the level of the superior constrictor muscle and comprised of mucosua/submucosa

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Improvement in Hypernasality	3-4 months post-operatively	The primary outcome of the study will be improvement of hypernasality assessed by the ACPA perceptual assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
ACPA Perceptual Assessment	3-4 months post-operatively	The remainder of the ACPA perceptual assessment (hyponasality, audible nasal emission, articulation proficiency, overall intelligibility, and compensatory articulation),
post-operative pain	0-2 months post-operatively	Post-op pain will be tracked using a validated pain scale as well as medication log.
complications associated with the procedure	0-1 month post-operatively	subjectively assessed

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Childrens Hospital London Health Sciences Center; 🇨🇦 London, Ontario, Canada