Evaluation of a Bioactive Composite for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Prospective Clinical Study
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Restoration Wear
- Sponsor
- Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo - FORP USP
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was evaluated longitudinally evaluate, after a 6-months period, the clinical performance of an alkasit- based material (Cention N, Ivoclar) in molars with root canal treatment. This randomized clinical trial that included 33 patients with an endodontically treated mandibular molar requiring restoration. Patients were randomly assigned according to the restorative treatment: control: restoration with Bulk-fill resin (Ivoclar - n=17) and restoration with alkasite-based material (Ivoclar - n=16). A self-etching adhesive was applied. Three calibrated professionals used the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria to evaluate retention, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, restoration color, marginal pigmentation, and anatomical shape at seven days (baseline) and six months. The radiographic analysis assessed the presence of a radiolucent line adjacent to the restoration, the lack or excess of the material, contact point, and caries recurrence in both periods. Data were analyzed by Friedman, Kruskall-Walis, and Wilcoxon tests (a=0.05). After 6 months of follow up, the Alksite-based demonstrated greater wear of the anatomical shape (p=0.022), and a greater color difference compared to natural tooth (p=0.0332), both with a statistically significant difference. All other criteria did not show significant differences between the materials or the analysis periods. The use of Alkasite-based material on endodontically treated teeth influenced the color and anatomical shape performance, however did not influence the longevity and success of the composite restorations after six months. Alkasite Based material may be an alternative for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Both genders; Presence of 1 lower molar (First or Second) treated endodontically requiring direct restoration; Endodontic treatment performed for a maximum of 6 months; Presence of antagonist tooth in the dental arch; No parafunctional habits; No temporomandibular disorder; age 18 to 40 years
Exclusion Criteria
- •Teeth with extensive loss with indication of indirect restorations were excluded from the study; teeth with root involvement such as fractures or cracks, patients with poor oral hygiene, patients with chronic or aggressive periodontitis, teeth that were endodontically treated for more than 6 months and teeth without provisional cavity sealing
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified