MedPath

Outcomes of Patient Blood Management in Severely Anemic Patients

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Severe Anemia
Interventions
Other: Patient Blood Management (PBM)
Biological: Allogeneic transfusion
Registration Number
NCT06345417
Lead Sponsor
Helios Klinik Gotha/Ohrdruf
Brief Summary

The goal of this observational cohort study is to compare patients with very low red blood counts who receive different therapy. Its main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Which group of patients dies more frequent: Patients who receive patient blood management only, patients who receive patient blood management and transfusions or patients who receive only transfusions?

* Among these groups: which group of patients has more complications during hospital stay? Patients will either receive patient blood management, which is the management of anemia, bleeding and coagulation problems, will receive transfusions, that is, blood from other people, or a mix of both.

Detailed Description

Background:

There seems to be a clear relationship between hemoglobin level and inhospital morbidity and mortality. To mitigate negative effects of lower hemoglobin levels, that is, anemia, transfusions are given when the hemoglobin level of the patient reaches a point deemed detrimental by the treating health care personnel. Patient Blood Management (PBM) adds to the armamentarium of anemia therapy, starting typically well before transfusions are given, and sometimes beyond this point. PBM utilizes medical strategies to enhance the patients own red cell mass and to alleviate the ill effects of disease and bleeding on hematopoesis and homeostasis.

Objective:

The objectives of the present study is to investigate the effects of 2 different management strategies of severe anemia, namely PBM exclusively or PBM with transfusion therapy, and compare them to standard transfusion therapy as regards inhospital mortality and morbidity.

Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that severely anemic participants who received a combination of PBM and restrictive transfusion regime would have a lower mortality and less complications than participants receiving a liberal transfusion therapy without PBM, while participants not being transfused at all will have increased mortality and morbidity.

Setting: The study will be performed at HELIOS Klinikum Gotha (HKG) and Helios Klinikum Erfurt (HKE) which are two neighboring hospitals with overlapping personnel, purchasing, IT departments and standard operating procedures. Both hospitals offer basic, advanced and specialist care to their communities. HKG offers PBM to their patients, while HKE does not.

Data sources: Data will be sourced from the hospital information systems of HKG and HKE.

Diseases are coded with the ICD-10-GM (International Code of Diseases, Version 10, Germany) and procedures using the OPS code (Procedure Key, analogous to the International Code of Procedures).

Participants: All adult patients treated between 1.6.2008 and 31.12.2020 in HKG and HKE will be eligible for enrollment when they were treated by a specialty that both hospitals offer and suffer from severe anemia, defined as a nadir hemoglobin of \< 8 g/dL.

Interventions:

Study group 1: Participants in this group received full PBM measures as clinically appropriate, but were not transfused at all.

Study group 2: Participants in this group received convenience measures of PBM and were transfused as deemed necessary in an environment where a restrictive transfusion strategy is encouraged.

Control:

The control group was treated without systematic PBM offered to patients and transfusions were the only standard of care for severely anemic patients.

Outcome:

Primary outcome is inhospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are morbidity measures, such as acute myocardial infarction, blood stream infection, cerebrovascular accident, transfusion complications, readmission rates, etc.

Study design:

This is a dual-center, retrospective observational cohort study. Reporting of results will be performed in line with the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement extension of the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

The study will be guided by a study protocol with an attached statistical analysis plan.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20000
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult
  • nadir hemoglobin < 8 g/dL
Exclusion Criteria
  • treatment in a non-comparable specialty
  • transfer from hospital in the first 6 h after arrival
  • requesting PBM / transfusion-free therapy but not offered

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PBM onlyPatient Blood Management (PBM)Participants in study group 1 receive full PBM while they opted not to receive transfusions. Full PBM included an individualized, structured approach to detection and management of anemia, bleeding and coagulopathy. PBM is provided in a timely manner.
PBM with transfusionPatient Blood Management (PBM)Participants in the study group 2 receive partial PBM together with transfusions when deemed necessary. Transfusions are given by physicians encouraged to use a restrictive transfusion strategy. PBM is delivered to patients at a convenient time, resorting to a set of standard PBM measures rather than individualized care.
PBM with transfusionAllogeneic transfusionParticipants in the study group 2 receive partial PBM together with transfusions when deemed necessary. Transfusions are given by physicians encouraged to use a restrictive transfusion strategy. PBM is delivered to patients at a convenient time, resorting to a set of standard PBM measures rather than individualized care.
Transfusion onlyAllogeneic transfusionThe control group is treated in an environment where PBM is not implemented and transfusion is the standard therapy for severe anemia.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of dead participants at the end of hospitalization (inhospital mortality)From date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Death at discharge from hospital

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of participants with a documented acute myocardial infarctionFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Acute myocardial infarction (as documented by increase in troponin in conjunction with AMI diagnose)

Number of participants suffering renal injuryFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Renal injury (according to RIFLE criteria)

Number of participants with a documented transfusion reactionFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Transfusion reactions (according to ICD codes T80.3 and T80.4)

Number of participants readmitted to the studied hospitalFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Readmission within 30 days

Number of participants with documented respiratory complicationsFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Respiratory complications as documented by ventilation support rate (per admission)

Number of participants with surgical wound complicationsFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Number of participants with a documented presence of surgical wound complications (according to pre-specified ICD list)

Number of days spent in hospital (Length of stay in hospital)From date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Length of stay in hospital, calculated in days

Number of participants treated in an intensive care wardFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Indicator whether or not the participant was treated in an intensive care unit

Number of participants receiving an allogeneic transfusionFrom date of admission to hospital until the date of discharge from hospital or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for the whole hospitalization period, assessed up to 100 months

Transfusion rates per admission, calculated for red blood cells, platelets, plasma

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Helios Klinikum

🇩🇪

Gotha, Thuringia, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath