MedPath

The International Diabetes Closed Loop (iDCL) Trial: Protocol 4

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes
Interventions
Other: Sensor-Augmented Pump (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)
Device: interoperable Artificial Pancreas System (iAPS)
Registration Number
NCT04436796
Lead Sponsor
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Brief Summary

The investigators aim to compare the efficacy and safety of an AID system using an adaptive MPC algorithm versus SAP (which may or may not include PLGS; to be referred to as SAP) in people with type 1 diabetes.

Detailed Description

A randomized crossover trial will compare the efficacy and safety of an automated insulin delivery (AID) study system using an adaptive Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm versus SAP (which may or may not include PLGS; to be referred to as SAP) therapy in people with type 1 diabetes for 13 weeks in each arm of the study. A Pilot Phase using the study system for 10-14 days will be conducted prior to the crossover trial.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year
  • Using an insulin pump for at least 3 months (which may include use of automated features)
  • Familiarity and use of a carbohydrate ratio for meal boluses
  • Age ≥18.0 years old
  • For females, not currently known to be pregnant. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of child-bearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued.
  • If using a personal CGM, willingness to use a Dexcom G6 CGM and discontinue personal CGM use during the study
  • Willing not to begin use of, or not to continue use of if currently using, a personal AID (closed loop control) system during the study; note if the system offers an open-loop mode or can be switched to a PLGS mode that is compatible with the Dexcom G6, the system may be used during the study in these modes only
  • Willingness to switch to lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) if not using already, and to use no other insulin besides lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) during the study
  • Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial, and not to use Afrezza during the trial
  • Investigator believes that the participant can successfully and safely operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Use of Afrezza or any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent other than metformin (including GLP-1 agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas) unless participant is willing to discontinue during the trial.
  • Two or more episodes of DKA requiring an emergency room visit or hospitalization in the past 6 months
  • Two or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia with seizure or loss of consciousness in the last 6 months
  • Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
  • A medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator could create a safety concern for the participant or put the study at risk. History of frequent severe hypoglycemia or history of frequent severe hyperglycemia and/or ketosis, without emergency room visit or hospitalization, due to poor diabetes self-management may be disqualifying per investigator judgment
  • Participation in another pharmaceutical or device trial at the time of enrollment or during the study
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sensor Augmented Pump/Predictive Low Glucose SuspendSensor-Augmented Pump (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS)Subjects will continue use of home insulin pump with a study continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and study glucometer. Subject may use home pump in PLGS mode if this is supported and compatible with the study sensor.
Artificial Pancreasinteroperable Artificial Pancreas System (iAPS)Subjects will be provided the Interoperable Artificial Pancreas System (iAPS) which includes the iAPS phone platform, a study insulin pump, study continuous glucose monitor (CGM), and a study glucometer. This iAPS is designed to help control blood sugar in people living with type 1 diabetes.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent CGM Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL13 weeks

This results shown is mean percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL.

Non-inferiority for CGM Time <54 mg/dL13 weeks

Superiority for time in range 70-180 mg/dL and non-inferiority for time \<54 mg/dL measured with CGM will be considered primary endpoints, analyzed using a hierarchical gatekeeping testing procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Coefficient of Variation13 weeks

CGM measured glucose variability measured with the coefficient of variation (CV)

Total Daily Insulin13 weeks

Total Daily Insulin (units)

CGM Time > 18013 weeks

CGM time \> 180 mg/dL

CGM Mean Glucose13 weeks

CGM-measured mean glucose (mg/dL)

CGM Time > 25013 weeks

CGM time \> 250 mg/dL

CGM Time < 7013 weeks

CGM time \< 70 mg/dL

CGM Time < 54 (Superiority)13 weeks

CGM time \< 54 mg/dL (Superiority)

CGM Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL13 weeks

CGM-measured % in range 70-140 mg/dL

Standard Deviation13 weeks

CGM measured glucose variability measured with the standard deviation (SD)

LBGI13 weeks

Low blood glucose index (LBGI) by CGM with higher index indicating higher risk of hypoglycemia. LBGI ≤ 1.1 is associated with minimal risk of hypoglycemia, 1.1 \< LBGI ≤ 2.5 is associated with a low risk of hypoglycemia, 2.5 \< LBGI ≤ 5.0 is associated with a moderate risk of hypoglycemia, and LBGI \> 5.0 is associated with high risk of hypoglycemia.

HbA1c at 13 Weeks13 weeks

Hemiglobin A1c measured after completing each study arm

Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (Total Scale)13 weeks

The GMSS for Type 1 Diabetes contains four subscales as well as a total scale. For this measure, total scale is reported. To calculate the total scale (higher scores indicate greater satisfaction): Mean of all items 1-15 (reverse code items: 2-7, 9, 11-13, and 15) which are all scored on a 5 point scale (1-5) (Minimum Total Scale Score is 1, Maximum Total Scale Score is 5)

Basal: Bolus Insulin Ratio13 weeks

Basal: bolus insulin ratio

Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale13 weeks

Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale has 20 items which are rated on a 4-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (not confident at all) to 4 (very confident) with higher scores indicating higher confidence in dealing with hypoglycemia. A single score is computed by calculating the mean of the sum of all items and ranges from 1 to 4.

CGM Time < 6013 weeks

CGM time \< 60 mg/dL

CGM Time > 30013 weeks

CGM time \> 300 mg/dL

HBGI13 weeks

High Blood Glucose Index (HBGI) is a measure of Hyperglycemic Risk based on frequency and severity of hyperglycemic events. HBGI \< 4.5 is associated with lower risk of hyperglycemia, 4.5 \< HBGI \< 9 is associated with a moderate risk of hyperglycemia and HBGI \> 9 is associated with high risk of hyperglycemia

Number of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% at 13 Weeks13 weeks

Number of participants HbA1c \<7.0% after completing each study arm

Number of Participants With HbA1c <7.5% at 13 Weeks3 months

Number of participants HbA1c \<7.5% after completing each study arm

Diabetes Distress Scale at 13 Weeks - Total Score13 weeks

Diabetes Distress Scale for adults has 28 items rated on a 6 point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (a very serious problem). The total score is the mean of the sum of responses and ranges from 1 to 6 where a higher score indicates greater degrees of diabetes distress.

INSPIRE Survey Scores - Following Study System Period Only13 weeks

The INSPIRE questionnaire assesses user expectations and experiences with Insulin Delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections, Expectations (INSPIRE). Survey total scores are computed by calculating the mean of the sum of all item ratings then multiplying the mean by 25 to scale the score to a range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a more positive perception of insulin delivery systems. Items are rated on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The Adult survey has 22 items, the Teens/Adolescents survey has 17 items and the Parent survey has 21 items.

SUS Survey Scores - Following Study System Period13 weeks

System Usability Scores (SUS)-composite score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate better perceived usability

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

🇺🇸

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Joslin Diabetes Center

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Stanford University

🇺🇸

Stanford, California, United States

Mayo Clinic

🇺🇸

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath