跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01973738
NCT01973738Unknown不适用

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between Raloxifene and Bazedoxifene in Postmenopausal Women.

Toshihiko Kono1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2012年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
Effects of raloxifene vs. bazedoxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and bone quality markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

研究概览

简要总结

Although there are two kinds of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) :raloxifene (RLX) and bazedoxifene (BZA), the difference is still unclear. In this study, we plan to compare clinical efficacy and safety between RLX and BZA.

详细描述

Selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) is an important option for postmenopausal osteoporosis. There are two SERM approved in Japan for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women at increased risk of fracture. One is raloxifene (RLX), and the other is bazedoxifene (BZA). There are few reports concerning to the clinical efficacy and safety data. In this study, we plan to compare clinical efficacy and safety between RLX and BZA.

The main objective of this study is to reveal the effects of RLX and BZA on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and bone quality markers.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
45 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Postmenopausal women

排除标准

  • Patients who could not use SERM

结局指标

主要结局

Effects of raloxifene vs. bazedoxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and bone quality markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

时间窗: Up to 72 months

The investigators plan to analyze 300 patients who undergo selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) treatments for five years. We investigate the efficacy of two SERMs: raloxifene (RLX) and bazedoxifene (BZA). Bone mineral density (BMD) andd laboratory analyses (bone markers, routine chemistry, urine, and bone quality marker of pentosidine) at baseline and every four to six months. We also investigate the side effects. Statical analyses are performed using Spearman correlation coefficients, paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test to compare the efficacy and safy between RLX and BZA.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Toshihiko Kono
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Toshihiko Kono

Head of Hospital

Tomidahama Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验