跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06210451
NCT06210451招募中不适用

Lubricant Gel Versus Sterile Water for Speculum Insertion During Embryo Transfer: a Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

Wolfson Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 416 人开始时间: 2024年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
416
试验地点
1
主要终点
Ongoing pregnancy or live birth rate.

研究概览

简要总结

Lubrication gels are widely used in numerous gynecologic procedures in order to ease the insertion of speculum and visualize the cervix. It was shown that applying lubricating gels significantly decreases patient pain during vaginal speculum examination. While many fertility specialists use lubrication gels to insert the speculum during embryo transfer (ET), others are strongly reluctant to use gels due to concern that they might have a detrimental effect on embryos and ET success. Similar concern was prevalent regarding the use of lubrication gel during Pap-smear for detection of cervical dysplasia. However, several studies have shown that the use of small amount of water-soluble gel does not change cervical cytology. Lubrication gels might have deleterious effect on sperm motility. However, there wasn't any study examining the effect of lubricant gel on ET success.

The investigators hypothesize that using a lubrication gel will not reduce the live birth rate per transfer, but decrease patient pain during procedure.

详细描述

In vitro fertilization (IVF) involves a highly complex series of events leading to the creation of an embryo. The transfer of that embryo, the final step in the process, is seen as a critical moment at the culmination of this incredibly intricate process. The technique of the embryo transfer (ET) has undergone a slow evolution, but for many physicians, this step remains relatively consistent throughout years of practice. While the procedure itself is relatively short, physicians often have specific preferences for each of the steps involved, either supported by evidence, learned from mentors or guided by experience and individual success. As such, ET success rates are a statistic that generates significant pride among physicians and are often tracked by clinics as a quality control metric. Interestingly, there are significant outcome differences between physicians.

Numerous techniques and practices employed during ET have been studied. For some, the evidence is robust, while for others, it is very limited. Some practices and techniques were found to improve ET success, such as: abdominal US guidance, removal of cervical mucus, use of a soft catheter, and placement of the embryo at a distance of more than 10 mm from the uterine fundus. For other aspects of ET there is no sufficient evidence to decide on the preferred practice. These include the optimal length of the procedure and rotation of the catheter during withdrawal. Good-quality randomized clinical trials are much needed in order to decide on the best practice. For example, there was previously a concern that the use of powdered gloves during ET might be toxic to the embryos. However, a single RCT (n=712) has shown that using powdered gloves resulted in similar pregnancy rates compared to unpowdered gloves.

Lubrication gels are widely used in numerous gynecologic procedures in order to ease the insertion of speculum and visualize the cervix. It was shown that applying lubricating gels significantly decreases patient pain during vaginal speculum examination. While many fertility specialists use lubrication gels to insert the speculum during ET, others are strongly reluctant to use gels due to concern that they might have a detrimental effect on embryos and ET success. Similar concern was prevalent regarding the use of lubrication gel during Pap-smear for detection of cervical dysplasia. However, several studies have shown that the use of small amount of water-soluble gel does not change cervical cytology. Lubrication gels might have deleterious effect on sperm motility. However, there wasn't any study examining the effect of lubricant gel on ET success.

The investigators hypothesize that using a lubrication gel will not reduce the live birth rate per transfer, but decrease patient pain during procedure.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-40
  • Fresh and thawed ET
  • Patients undergoing their 1st-3rd ET
  • ET of 1-2 embryos

排除标准

  • Egg donation cycles

结局指标

主要结局

Ongoing pregnancy or live birth rate.

时间窗: 3 years

Number of patients with ongoing pregnancy or live birth at \>20 week's gestation.

次要结局

  • Questionnaire(3 years)
  • Positive serum BHCG(3 years)
  • Clinical pregnancy(3 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yossi Mizrachi

Principal Investigator

Wolfson Medical Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验