跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05589259
NCT05589259尚未招募不适用

A Novel Treatment Approach to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): A Feasibility Study of Combined Peripheral Nerve Block and Physiotherapy

Tracy Cupido2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2025年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Feasibility Assessment

研究概览

简要总结

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition affecting 1 in 5 Canadians with a yearly economic cost of over $40 billion in healthcare spending and loss of productivity. Since the prevalence of chronic pain is increasing, especially as the population ages, effective low-cost treatment is key to reduce the impact of chronic pain on patient quality of life and on healthcare costs. Due to the complexity of chronic pain and differences between the multitudes of pain conditions, developing effective treatments is challenging. This is especially true for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

CRPS is characterized by severe pain out of proportion to tissue trauma, with local autonomic and inflammatory changes. The severity of pain from CRPS may result in an inability to work, depression, sleep disorders, or suicidal ideation.

Although its prevalence is low in Canada, CRPS is considered one the most debilitating and least understood pain conditions. As most current treatment options have low evidence of effectiveness, there is no definitive treatment available and most often, patients are struggling to maintain an acceptable quality of life. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify new and improved treatments for adults with CRPS.

An early hypothesis of CRPS pathophysiology posited that sympathetic nervous system over-activity led to many of the signs and symptoms of CRPS. As such, sympathetic nerve blocks, including stellate ganglion and lumbar sympathetic blocks, have been repeatedly investigated as a potential treatment of CRPS. However, a recent meta-analysis suggests that these blocks provided no benefits for those suffering with CRPS. Newer evidence suggests that a peripheral microvascular dysfunction may underlie CRPS pathophysiology. However, no clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of a treatment targeting this peripheral pathway.

The goal of this project is to assess the efficacy of a single-shot axillary approach to the brachial plexus block plus physiotherapy as a novel treatment protocol for CRPS. Our primary hypothesis is that providing a brachial plexus block in conjunction with a physiotherapy program would be superior to physiotherapy alone in treating pain and function in CRPS. Since this is a novel treatment protocol for CRPS, the purpose of our proposed study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered clinical trial.

详细描述

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition affecting 1 in 5 Canadians with a yearly economic cost of over $40 billion in healthcare spending and loss of productivity. Since the prevalence of chronic pain is increasing, especially as the population ages, effective low-cost treatment is key to reduce the impact of chronic pain on patient quality of life and on healthcare costs. Due to the complexity of chronic pain and differences between the multitudes of pain conditions, developing effective treatments is challenging. This is especially true for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

CRPS is characterized by severe pain out of proportion to tissue trauma, with local autonomic and inflammatory changes. The severity of pain from CRPS may result in an inability to work, depression, sleep disorders, or suicidal ideation.

Although its prevalence is low in Canada, CRPS is considered one the most debilitating and least understood pain conditions. As most current treatment options have low evidence of effectiveness, there is no definitive treatment available and most often, patients are struggling to maintain an acceptable quality of life. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify new and improved treatments for adults with CRPS.

An early hypothesis of CRPS pathophysiology posited that sympathetic nervous system over-activity led to many of the signs and symptoms of CRPS. As such, sympathetic nerve blocks, including stellate ganglion and lumbar sympathetic blocks, have been repeatedly investigated as a potential treatment of CRPS. However, a recent meta-analysis suggests that these blocks provided no benefits for those suffering with CRPS. Newer evidence suggests that a peripheral microvascular dysfunction may underlie CRPS pathophysiology. However, no clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of a treatment targeting this peripheral pathway. Current evidence of the efficacy of peripheral nerve block in treating CRPS are mostly derived from small case studies involving cost- and labour-intense regimens, including in-patient protocols with continuous nerve blocks.

The goal of this project is to assess the efficacy of a single-shot axillary brachial plexus block plus physiotherapy as a novel treatment protocol for CRPS. Our primary hypothesis is that providing a brachial plexus block in conjunction with a physiotherapy program would be superior to physiotherapy alone in treating pain and function in CRPS. Since this is a novel treatment protocol for CRPS, the purpose of our proposed study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered clinical trial. The specific aims of the feasibility trial are to assess: 1) the capacity (recruitment and staffing) required for conducting a fully powered trial, 2) the design of the novel treatment protocol, and 3) the patient response to treatment and trial protocol.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 110 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Meets the Budapest criteria for CRPS of the upper extremity
  • Able to consent to treatment.

排除标准

  • Allergy to local anesthetic
  • Allergy to chlorhexidine
  • Infection at site of injection
  • Previous treatment of current CRPS with a regional anesthetic technique within 6 months
  • Unable to tolerate regional anesthesia or physiotherapy
  • Another pain condition that affects the same limb
  • Patient refusal or inability to consent.

研究组 & 干预措施

Axillary Brachial Plexus Block plus Physiotherapy

Experimental

Participants who are randomized to the experimental group (EXP arm) will receive a single-shot axillary-approach brachial plexus block with 1.5mg/kg (up to 50mg total) bupivacaine 0.25% at the Kingston Health Sciences Centre Chronic Pain Clinic (KHSC-CPC). Prior to treatment, a blinded third party will perform a baseline physical exam. Under the brachial plexus block, the physiotherapist will provide standard of care, including manual therapy. The patient will then complete a 6-week physiotherapy program, including GMI. Following the 6 week program, a blind observer will repeat the physical exam.

干预措施: Axillary Brachial Plexus Block plus Physiotherapy (Procedure)

Physiotherapy alone

Active Comparator

Participants who are randomized to not receive a block (CON arm) will also have a baseline physical exam performed by a blinded third party. Following baseline data collection, the physiotherapist will provide standard of care, including manual therapy. They will then complete a 6-week home exercise program, including GMI. Following the 6 week program, a blinded observer will repeat the physical exam.

干预措施: Physiotherapy alone (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Feasibility Assessment

时间窗: 2 years

Assess the ability to recruit 60 patients (30 per arm) to complete the study protocol. Protocol data: Attrition (with reasons) will be monitored by the research coordinator. Data completeness will be computed from data entered from surveys and electronic diaries. Treatment compliance data (visit attendance and average hours/day of home exercise completed weekly) will be collected. Staff time will be monitored using logs by each team member (e.g., physician, physiotherapist, blind assessor, nurses). Patient satisfaction: A custom patient satisfaction questionnaire will also be completed with post-treatment clinical assessment questionnaire to capture patients' impression of the study protocol (e.g., time commitment, treatment length).

次要结局

  • Cost(2 years)

研究者

发起方
Tracy Cupido
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Tracy Cupido

Principal Investigator

Queen's University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验