Evaluation of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) - An Interview Support Aiming to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Adherence
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 248
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Treatment Credibility Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Studies show that the mental health of children may have deteriorated in recent decades. In Sweden, several national initiatives have been implemented to develop and strengthen interventions for children's mental health. One of these initiatives involves enhancing the first line of primary care for children with mental health issues, whose mission is to provide early intervention, i.e., support for mild to moderate mental health problems. The responsibility for children with moderate to severe mental health issues lies with child and adolescent psychiatry.
Research indicates that children with a migration background, to a lesser extent than native-born children, have contact with both the first line of mental health care and child and adolescent psychiatry. There is also research showing that when newly arrived individuals do seek care, they may receive poorer quality care than others and, for example, may be misunderstood. From the perspective of equal healthcare, this is a significant shortcoming. In our study, the investigators address differences between healthcare providers and families based on cultural factors as a possible reason for the lack of equality in healthcare.
In the study, the investigators aim to evaluate whether the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) improves the connection between healthcare providers and families and increases the family's involvement in treatment, ultimately leading to better mental health for the child. The method can be said to aim at enhancing the assessment, compliance, and treatment that are currently available within healthcare.
详细描述
The overall aim of the project is is to evaluate the effects and experiences of the CFI, which aims to be a tool for assessing mental health regardless of cultural background. Developed by world-leading researchers in the field, CFI is intended to support psychiatric diagnosis, strengthen the alliance between healthcare providers and patients, and contribute to treatment planning that both parties agree on, thereby increasing adherence to treatment.
The specific research questions are:
Study Part 1 (Quantitative Method):
- Do caregivers, where the child undergoes an enhanced assessment with CFI (i.e., standard care + CFI), report better working alliance and treatment credibility compared to children receiving standard care?
- Do caregivers, where the child undergoes an enhanced assessment with CFI, report reduced mental health issues and increased quality of life compared to children receiving standard care?
Study Part 2 (Qualitative Method):
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 Years 至 14 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Children between the ages of 6-14
- •Families seeking care at any of the participating clinics
- •Families assessed as suitable for interventions at the clinic where they seek care.
- •Study Part 2
- •Caregivers who have consented to participate in Part 1 and have been interviewed using CFI as part of the study
- •Healthcare providers/personnel who have used CFI as part of Part 1.
排除标准
- •Study Part 1
- •Children who have not yet turned 6 years old and individuals aged 15 and above
- •The child is assessed as not suitable for interventions at the clinic where they seek care.
- •Study Part 2
- •Caregivers who have not consented to participate in Part
- •Caregivers who have not been interviewed using CFI as part of the study.
- •Healthcare providers/personnel who have not used CFI as part of Part 1.
研究组 & 干预措施
CFI + Usual Care
About half of participants who are allocated to a person who works with the CFI during the trial.
干预措施: Cultural Formulation Interview (Other)
Usual Care
About half of participants who are allocated to a person who do not work with the CFI during the trial (i.e., usual care).
结局指标
主要结局
Treatment Credibility Scale
时间窗: Two-three weeks after the baseline assessment
The scale includes four statements (for example, "So far, how well do you think this care seems to fit your problems?"). The informant can respond on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10.
次要结局
- Working Alliance Inventory(Three months after the baseline assessment)
- KIDSCREEN-10(Three months after the baseline assessment)
- The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale(Three months after the baseline assessment)
研究者
Christina Dalman
Professor
Karolinska Institutet
