The Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on the Efficacy of Antidepressant Treatment in Depression
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Hamilton Depression Score
研究概览
简要总结
Recent research demonstrates that the composition of the gut microbiome is a master regulator of key neurophysiological processes that are affected in depression. Indeed, contemporary studies showed that faecal microbiota is altered in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Furthermore, it has also been shown that supplementation of probiotics ameliorated depressive symptoms in unmedicated patients with mild to moderate depression. However, no study has yet explored the efficacy of a probiotic-based therapy in patients with severe MDD in addition to a standard antidepressant treatment. As dietary and lifestyle interventions may be a desirable, effective, pragmatical and non-stigmatizing prevention and adjuvant therapy (in addition to antidepressant treatment) in depression, this project is aimed at investigating for the first time if probiotic supplementation compared to a placebo treatment improves the effect of standard antidepressant medication on depressive symptoms (i.e. better and faster remission) in patients with severe MDD. Furthermore, this study will further test if probiotic supplementation modulates immune signalling and inflammatory processes (macrophage migration inhibitory factor and interleukin 1 beta), hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis responses (saliva cortisol), neurogenesis (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression), the release of appetite-regulating hormones (leptin and ghrelin), the composition of gut microbiota (in particular levels of Enterobacteriaceae, Alistipes and Faecalibacterium) and brain perfusion, structure and activation and if these changes are associated with the probiotic-induced effect on depressive symptoms.
详细描述
Major depression is a recurrent and debilitating mental disorder with a lifetime prevalence of up to 20% in the general population, among the highest for psychiatric disorders. Its diagnosis is based upon the presence of persisting affective, cognitive and behavioural symptoms, with a depressive episode requiring at least five of these symptoms during a period of at least two weeks. When considering the biological mechanisms that underpin depression, the most conclusive findings include deficits in the serotonergic (5-HT) neurotransmission, alterations in the expression of BDNF, deficient immune activation and neuroinflammation, and dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Thus, understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of MDD has widespread implications for the development of novel treatment and prevention strategies. However, despite advancements in the development of novel therapeutics, current treatment options have not reached optimal efficacy. Treatment resistant depression occurs in up to 40% of patients and standard antidepressant medication has a variety of undesirable side effects such as sedation, decrease of blood pressure, increase of weight, indigestion or sexual dysfunction. This often results in patients' poor compliance resulting in a break-up of medication with recurrence of depressive symptoms and increased suicidal risk. As there is an unmet need to develop safer and more effective treatments in depression, a major topic of future psychiatric care is to focus on different possible physiologically relevant mechanisms in order to establish alternative, causative and easy available treatment strategies.
In the past few years, it has become increasingly evident that resident gut bacteria are an important contributor to healthy metabolism and there is significant evidence linking altered composition of the gut microbiota and metabolic disorders such as obesity and depression. Preclinical work in animals have reported associations between alterations of the gut microbiome (the community of microorganism that live in the human gut) and anxiety-like behaviour, depressive-like symptoms and stress responsiveness. In line with these preclinical findings, a recent study found an altered composition of faecal microbiota in patients with MDD. Most notably, the MDD group had increased levels of Enterobacteriaceae and Alistipes but reduced levels of Faecalibacterium, which was negatively correlated with the severity of depressive symptoms.
Accumulating evidence suggest that there exits a bi-directional communication system between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain. Changes in gut microbiota can influence cognitive and emotional stress processes through interactions with the brain and altered emotional states and dysfunction of the gut microbiome-brain axis has been implicated in stress-related disorders such as depression. Brain-gut interactions could occur in various ways: 1) microbial compounds communicate via the vagus nerve, which connects the brain and the digestive tract, and 2) microbially derived metabolites interact with the immune system, which maintains its own communication with the brain. Although the pathways linking gut bacteria with the brain are incompletely understood, one of the principal mechanisms proposed to underlie stress-induced alterations is the "leaky gut" phenomenon. Specifically, increased translocation of bacterial products, due to a compromised gut barrier has been linked to activation of the immune system and HPA axis. In line with these findings, human studies have demonstrated a stress-induced increase in bacterial translocation in depression. The stress-induced interactions between the gut microbiome and the brain are further mediated via central processes such as neurotransmission and neurogenesis. For instance, there is substantial evidence to demonstrate a role for the gut commensals in the regulation and development of the 5-HT system and the expression of BDNF. Virtually all corticolimbic brain structures that are involved in mood regulation and stress response express 5-HT receptors. These include the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. A recent meta-analyses of fMRI studies support hyperactivation of several of these regions in response to fearful faces in MDD, which extent correlated positively with the severity of depressive symptoms. Furthermore, during resting state fMRI, MDD patients showed lower connectivity between the amydgala, hippocampus, parahippocampus, and brainstem, while the connectivity strength was inversely correlated with general depression. The hippocampus, and its connection to other limbic, striatal and PFC regions, seems to play a key role in stress regulation, given that hippocampal neurogenesis mediates antidepressant effects via the ventral hippocampus' influence on the HPA axis, and mechanisms by which antidepressants may reverse chronic stress-induced 5-HT and neurogenic changes. Notably, BDNF may contribute to the modulation of neurogenesis in response to both stress and antidepressants, as hippocampal BDNF levels decrease in response to chronic stress and increase in response to antidepressant treatments.
Besides being a fundamental player in eating processes and in hypothalamic regulation of energy balance, the appetite-regulating hormones leptin and ghrelin had been implicated in the etiology of mood disorders. Importantly, particular species of bacteria in the gut are know to affect the levels of leptin and ghrelin. In humans, the onset of depression was associated with a combination of high leptin levels coupled with high visceral fat, and the link between leptin levels and severity of depressive symptoms was mediated by adiposity. It was suggested that leptin might influence depression by acting on leptin receptors present on 5-HT neurons within the raphe nuclei and dopamine neurons in the midbrain and, thus, might influence reward processes. Consistent with this supposition, when leptin receptors in the rat hippocampus were genetically deleted, a stressor-induced depressive profile was apparent, and deletion of leptin receptors on midbrain dopamine neurons in mice elicited elevated anxiety. Thus, identifying the key brain regions that mediate leptin's antidepressant activity and dissecting its intracellular signal transduction pathways may provide new insights into the pathogenesis of depression and facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of this illness.
The gut peptide ghrelin also plays a fundamental role in eating and energy regulation and there have been indications that ghrelin functioning might contribute to depressive illness. Like leptin, ghrelin receptors have been reported in the midbrain and the dorsal raphe nucleus and have been associated with reward processes, as well as stressor-induced depressive-like symptoms, such as anhedonia. In line with a role for ghrelin in stressor-elicited depression, negative events promote an increase of circulating ghrelin levels and in emotionally reactive individuals the normalization of ghrelin levels after stress may be attenuated. Moreover, ghrelin was elevated among depressed patients and declined following pharmacotherapy and among patients who did not respond to treatment, ghrelin levels were higher than among patients who responded positively.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Mild depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) > 7).
- •Inpatient with antidepressant treatment at the UPK Basel.
- •Treatment as usual for depression
排除标准
- •Comorbid psychiatric disturbances such as substance abuse disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia.
- •Current medical conditions such as acute infectious disease, dietary restrictions.
- •Immunosuppressed patients
- •Pregnancy, breast-feeding.
- •Inability to read and understand the participant's information.
结局指标
主要结局
Hamilton Depression Score
时间窗: Change from baseline at week four
次要结局
- Beck depression score(Change from baseline at week four)
- Gastrointestinal side effects(Change from baseline at week four)
- Brain structure(Change from baseline at week four)
- Neurogenesis(Change from baseline at week four)
- Immunoregulation and inflammation(Change from baseline at week four)
- Brain perfusion(Change from baseline at week four)
- Appetite-regulating hormones(Change from baseline at week four)
- Cognition(Change from baseline at week four)
- Brain activation(Change from baseline at week four)
- HPA axis function(Change from baseline at week four)
- Psychopathology(Change from baseline at week four)
- State and trait anxiety(Change from baseline at week four)
- Social interactions(Change from baseline at week four)
- Sleep quality(Change from baseline at week four)
- Physical activity(Change from baseline at week four)
- Gut microbiota composition(Change from baseline at week four)
研究者
André Schmidt
Ph.D.
Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel
