A Randomized controlled Trial of PGE2 gel vs Transcervical Foleys Catheter for Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2/3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 62
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the change in Bishop score after 12 hours of induction with PGE 2 gel and transcervical Foley catheter in women with previous one LSCS.
研究概览
简要总结
Repeat cesarean section exposes women to multiple risks like blood loss, injury to the urinary tract, infections, adherent placenta, and cesarean hysterectomy. Vaginal birth after cesarean section is a procedure that can be offered to women who have had a prior cesarean section.
Induction of labor is often taken up in the interest of the mother and the fetus. Labor induction in the presence of an unfavorable cervix is associated with labor dystocia and a higher incidence of repeat cesarean section. Hence, the use of cervical ripening agents is beneficial. Induction with Foley catheter is a safe, inexpensive, and reliable method of cervical ripening, with a low risk of uterine tachysystole and fetal distress but poses a potential danger of accidental rupture of membranes, cord prolapse, chorioamnionitis, and pyrexia because of infection.5 While PGE 2 gel has also been proven to be effective for cervical ripening agents with a gradual onset of labor with the advantage of single application. Many studies that have evaluated cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) insert have shown conflicting results and in the absence of conclusive studies, many countries continue to use PGE2 for induction of labor.
Intracervical Foley catheter has been proven efficient in achieving cervical ripening and successful labor with reduction in latent phase of labor and total delivery time without increasing the rate of cesarean section, uterine tachysystole, and uterine rupture. Considering the good performance of maternal and neonatal outcomes, the intracervical Foley catheter has been suggested as a better choice for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor in women with previous cesarean sections in resource-limited settings.
Therefore, we decided to conduct a Randomized controlled trial at the setting of AIIMS Jodhpur to compare the effectiveness and safety profile of PGE2 gel with intracervical Foley’s catheter for ripening of cervix and induction of labor in women with previous 1 lower segment cesarean section
Sample size has been calculated to be62 patients (with31 patients in each group) considering alpha of 0.05 ,90% power and 20% attrition rate. Patients will be selected as per inclusion and exclusion criteria and preinduction workup will done followed by enrollment and consent . Group 1 and Group 2 will continue to be compared even after achieving of primary objective of study (difference in change of Bishop score between PGE2 gel and Foleys catheter ). Various parameters like Bishop score , presence of fetal distress , induction to delivery interval , mode of delivery , Apgar score will be noted and compared between the two methods of induction of labor . All the results will be evaluated statistically and whether any significant difference present or not will be noted. The entire study will be performed as per the ethical guidelines and monitoring and treatment will be done as per standard hospital policy .
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Investigator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 45.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •Pregnant women with history of previous one Lower segment cesarean section with Singleton pregnancy Gestational age more than 34 weeks Cephalic presentation Bishop score of less than or equal to 6 Reactive Non stress test Patients willing for Vaginal delivery after previous one LSCS.
排除标准
- •Contraindication to use of prostaglandins like history of bronchial asthma Previous uterine surgery other than Lower segment cesarean section Placenta Previa Active genital tract infection Abnormal fetal heart rate pattern Allergy to latex Patient refusal for consent of induction or vaginal delivery Any other contraindication for TOLAC.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the change in Bishop score after 12 hours of induction with PGE 2 gel and transcervical Foley catheter in women with previous one LSCS.
时间窗: 2 years
次要结局
- To compare mode of delivery between PGE2 gel versus Foleys catheter used for induction of labor
- To compare the rate of fetal distress between PGE2 gel versus transcervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in women with previous one LSCS(2 years)
- To compare induction to delivery interval between PGE 2 gel versus transcervical Foley catheter(2 years)
- To compare maternal complications like uterine tachysystole uterine rupture between PGE2 gel & Foley catheter useof labor in used for induction of labor in women with previous 1 LSCS(2 years)
- To compare APGAR score between PGE2 & Foley catheter used for induction of labor in women with previous 1 LSCS(2 years)
