Efficacy and Safety of Acute Followed by Maintenance rTMS in Treatment Resistant Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 68
- 主要终点
- To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on symptomatology in terms of change in MADRS score in patients with treatment resistance depression
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment works better to help people with treatment-resistant depression stay well after they improve with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation treatment. It will also learn about the safety of maintenance rTMS and maintenance quetiapine.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does maintenance rTMS help prevent depression from returning better than maintenance quetiapine? Do participants receiving maintenance rTMS have greater improvement in depression symptoms over time than those receiving maintenance quetiapine? What side effects or medical problems occur with each treatment?
Researchers will compare maintenance rTMS with maintenance quetiapine after all participants have completed the initial course of rTMS.
Participants will:
Receive an initial course of rTMS. Be randomly assigned to receive either maintenance rTMS or maintenance quetiapine.
Attend regular follow ups to assess depression symptoms with MADRS , assess overall improvement by CGI , and any side effects.
Provide blood samples at selected visits to measure brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that may be be linked to recovery from depression.
Be followed for several months to monitor whether their depression returns and how well they continue to improve.
详细描述
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major cause of disability and is associated with persistent symptoms, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare utilization, and a high risk of relapse despite evidence-based treatment. Although repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established treatment for TRD, many patients experience recurrence of depressive symptoms after completion of the acute treatment course. At present, there is no universally accepted maintenance strategy following successful acute rTMS.
Maintenance rTMS has shown promise in reducing relapse; however, existing randomized studies have primarily compared maintenance rTMS with sham stimulation, antidepressants, or lithium. No randomized controlled trial has directly compared maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) with quetiapine augmentation, despite quetiapine having Level 1 evidence as an augmentation strategy for TRD in the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines. This represents an important gap in evidence for long-term management following acute neuromodulation.
The present study is a hospital-based, investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, AIIMS Bhubaneswar. All participants will receive an acute course of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation while continuing treatment as usual (TAU). Following completion of the acute phase, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either maintenance aiTBS or quetiapine augmentation in addition to TAU. This design allows direct comparison of two evidence-based maintenance approaches after a common acute neuromodulation intervention.
The study will evaluate whether maintenance aiTBS provides sustained clinical benefit comparable or superior to quetiapine augmentation while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. In addition to clinical assessments, the study will examine changes in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a biomarker associated with neuroplasticity, to explore its relationship with treatment response during the maintenance phase.
The findings from this trial are expected to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety of maintenance neuromodulation versus pharmacological augmentation after acute rTMS in treatment-resistant depression. The results may help inform future maintenance treatment strategies and improve long-term outcomes for individuals with TRD.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients of both genders, between the ages 18- 60 years
- •Clinically diagnosed as depression according to ICD-
- •Diagnosis of treatment resistance depression according to US-FDA.
- •On stable dosing of antidepressant venlafaxine 150 mg per day.
- •Right-handed.
排除标准
- •Pregnant or lactating women.
- •Any kind of psychiatric emergency (E.g., Suicide risk, Catatonia, aggression or excitement)
- •Any co-morbid neurological disease
- •History of seizure/ epilepsy.
- •History of migraine.
- •History of head trauma/ organic brain condition.
- •Any contraindications to rTMS procedure:
- •Metallic or electronic implants in the brain or heart, or any cochlear implants
- •Injury or local lesion in the scalp/head.
研究组 & 干预措施
Acute iTBS + Maintenance iTBS + Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Arm 1 (aiTBS + TAU) Accelerated iTBS will be provided with a 100X transcranial magnetic stimulator with a 70 mm active cooled figure of eight coil. The parameters to be given are 3 pulses, frequency- 50 Hz bursts, 2 seconds on and 10 seconds off for 3 minutes and a total of 600 pulses per session. Each patient will receive 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks with a total of 20 sessions. Considering the high frequency of stimulation a round of three iTBS per treatment will be given separated by 15minutes, a total of 1800 pulses per day. The sessions will be given after calculating a resting motor threshold. Stimulation target will be dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
干预措施: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Device)
Acute iTBS + Quetiapine + Treatment as Usual (TAU)
The active intervention consists of Quetiapine Extended-Release (XR) administered once daily. Treatment will be individually tailored to patient requirements, with the daily maintenance dose adjusted between 100 mg and 200 mg based on clinical efficacy and side-effect tolerability.
干预措施: quetiapine (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on symptomatology in terms of change in MADRS score in patients with treatment resistance depression
时间窗: Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 12
次要结局
- To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on biomarker in terms of change in BDNF levels in patients with treatment resistance depression.(Change From Baseline in Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels at 12 Weeks.)
- To compare the efficacy of maintenance accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation vs Quetiapine on severity of illness in terms of change in CGI score in patients with treatment resistance depression.(Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) Score at 12 Weeks)
- To compare treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the study groups.(Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) during the 12-Week Study Period)
研究者
Dr. Debadatta Mohapatra
ASSOCIATE PROFFESOR
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
