Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06051799
NCT06051799
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Effects of Pressure Release of Myofascial Trigger Points on Mechanical Neck Pain. Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

Universidad Complutense de Madrid1 site in 1 country104 target enrollmentSeptember 25, 2023

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Neck
Sponsor
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Enrollment
104
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Visual analogue scale. Post treatment
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of myofascial trigger point treatment using pressure release versus a control group in patients with mechanical neck pain, randomly assigned. In both groups a protocol of therapeutic exercise and postural correction will be carried out

Detailed Description

With the present investigation it is wondered whether the choice of manual therapy techniques, specifically the pressure release of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, provide significant benefits in combination with therapeutic exercise and postural hygiene (treatment group), as opposed to the unique application of therapeutic exercise and postural hygiene (control group), thus constituting a treatment of choice in patients with mechanical neck pain. A treatment protocol of one session per week will be carried out, and a follow-up two weeks after the end of the treatment protocol. If, as postulated, pressure release is more effective than the treatment received by the control group, the choice of this type of technique for myofascial pain syndrome would benefit a high percentage of people who often come asking for treatment in pain treatment centers. Pressure release provides a painless manual stimulus, thus effectively resolving the symptomatology of myofascial trigger points without the need for invasive treatments or medication, which may have more contraindications.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 25, 2023
End Date
September 20, 2024
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Iván Batuecas Sánchez

PhD student, Principal investigator

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects between 18 and 55 years of age in order to avoid degenerative phenomena.
  • Have suffered from neck pain at least once in the last month.
  • Active or latent myofascial trigger points in the Upper Trapezius and Sternocleidomastoid muscles.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with recent trauma (last 6 months) to the upper quadrant or spine.
  • Patients with pathologies involving malignant neoplasms.
  • Surgery on the trunk or upper limb in the last six months.
  • Patients undergoing pharmacological or physiotherapy treatment at the time of the test.
  • Pregnancy.
  • No myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius or sternocleidomastoid muscles.
  • Refusal to sign the consent form for the study or not being able to do so.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Visual analogue scale. Post treatment

Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions

Measure of pain intensity. A mark is placed on a 10-centimetre line with the left end being no pain at all and the right end being the worst pain imaginable.

Cervical Disability Index. Base

Time Frame: Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session

Results on the Northwick Park Cervical Spine Disability Questionnaire, translated and validated in Spanish. The pre-questionnaire consists of 9 questions related to pain intensity, sleep, weight bearing, leisure and social activities, work and driving. Each question has 5 possible answers ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents the absence of disability and 4 the maximum degree of disability. Similarly, the subsequent questionnaire consists of 10 questions and the same answers. Taking this into account, the maximum score that can be obtained would be 36 in the pre-questionnaire or 40 in the post-questionnaire (categorised as high disability).

Pain catastrophising scale. Base

Time Frame: Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.

It is the set of cognitive and emotional processes consisting of having negative thoughts about the future that predispose to the chronification of pain. Self-administered scale made up of 13 items, each item scored from 0 to 4. The total score range is from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate a higher level of catastrophism. It is one of the most widely used to assess the pain catastrophising construct.

Pain catastrophising scale. Follow up

Time Frame: Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol

It is the set of cognitive and emotional processes consisting of having negative thoughts about the future that predispose to the chronification of pain. Self-administered scale made up of 13 items, each item scored from 0 to 4. The total score range is from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate a higher level of catastrophism. It is one of the most widely used to assess the pain catastrophising construct.

Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (ETK-11). Post treatment

Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions

Translated into Spanish. It is one of the most frequently used measures to assess pain-related fear of movement in patients with chronic pain. The ETK-11 is an 11-item self-questionnaire in its Spanish version that measures fear of movement and pain. The total score of the ETK-11 is between 11 - 44 points and each item has a likert scale that scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement and pain. The ETK-11 has two subscales: activity avoidance and harm avoidance.

Cervical Disability Index. Post treatment

Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions

Results on the Northwick Park Cervical Spine Disability Questionnaire, translated and validated in Spanish. The pre-questionnaire consists of 9 questions related to pain intensity, sleep, weight bearing, leisure and social activities, work and driving. Each question has 5 possible answers ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents the absence of disability and 4 the maximum degree of disability. Similarly, the subsequent questionnaire consists of 10 questions and the same answers. Taking this into account, the maximum score that can be obtained would be 36 in the pre-questionnaire or 40 in the post-questionnaire (categorised as high disability).

Pain catastrophising scale. Post treatment

Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions

It is the set of cognitive and emotional processes consisting of having negative thoughts about the future that predispose to the chronification of pain. Self-administered scale made up of 13 items, each item scored from 0 to 4. The total score range is from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate a higher level of catastrophism. It is one of the most widely used to assess the pain catastrophising construct.

Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (ETK-11). Follow up

Time Frame: Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol

Translated into Spanish. It is one of the most frequently used measures to assess pain-related fear of movement in patients with chronic pain. The ETK-11 is an 11-item self-questionnaire in its Spanish version that measures fear of movement and pain. The total score of the ETK-11 is between 11 - 44 points and each item has a likert scale that scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement and pain. The ETK-11 has two subscales: activity avoidance and harm avoidance.

Visual analogue scale. Base

Time Frame: Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session

Measure of pain intensity. A mark is placed on a 10-centimetre line with the left end being no pain at all and the right end being the worst pain imaginable.

Pressure pain threshold. Post treatment

Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions

Measurement of pain threshold to pressure with Fischer algometer. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the myofascial trigger point previously marked by the therapist. Once in place, the pressure is increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second (kg per sec) until the patient begins to feel discomfort. At this point, the application is stopped. Three measurements are taken and the average is calculated.

Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (ETK-11). Base

Time Frame: Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.

Translated into Spanish. It is one of the most frequently used measures to assess pain-related fear of movement in patients with chronic pain. The ETK-11 is an 11-item self-questionnaire in its Spanish version that measures fear of movement and pain. The total score of the ETK-11 is between 11 - 44 points and each item has a likert scale that scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement and pain. The ETK-11 has two subscales: activity avoidance and harm avoidance.

Visual analogue scale. Follow up

Time Frame: Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol

Measure of pain intensity. A mark is placed on a 10-centimetre line with the left end being no pain at all and the right end being the worst pain imaginable.

Pressure pain threshold. Base

Time Frame: Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session

Measurement of pain threshold to pressure with Fischer algometer. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the myofascial trigger point previously marked by the therapist. Once in place, the pressure is increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second (kg per sec) until the patient begins to feel discomfort. At this point, the application is stopped. Three measurements are taken and the average is calculated.

Pressure pain threshold. Follow up

Time Frame: Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol

Measurement of pain threshold to pressure with Fischer algometer. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the myofascial trigger point previously marked by the therapist. Once in place, the pressure is increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second (kg per sec) until the patient begins to feel discomfort. At this point, the application is stopped. Three measurements are taken and the average is calculated.

Cervical Disability Index. Follow up

Time Frame: Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol

Results on the Northwick Park Cervical Spine Disability Questionnaire, translated and validated in Spanish. The pre-questionnaire consists of 9 questions related to pain intensity, sleep, weight bearing, leisure and social activities, work and driving. Each question has 5 possible answers ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents the absence of disability and 4 the maximum degree of disability. Similarly, the subsequent questionnaire consists of 10 questions and the same answers. Taking this into account, the maximum score that can be obtained would be 36 in the pre-questionnaire or 40 in the post-questionnaire (categorised as high disability).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Swallow-wall distance. Base(Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.)
  • Swallow-wall distance. Post treatment(Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions)
  • Cervical flexion-extension. Post treatment(Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions.)
  • Side bending. Post treatment(Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions.)
  • Cervical flexion-extension. Base(Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.)
  • Cervical rotation. Post treatment(Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions.)
  • Side bending. Base(Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.)
  • Swallow-wall distance. Follow up(Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol)
  • Cervical flexion-extension. Follow up(Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol.)
  • Cervical rotation. Follow up(Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol.)
  • Cervical rotation. Base(BaselinePrior to the first treatment session.)
  • Side bending. Follow up(Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials