跳至主要内容
临床试验/ACTRN12619001024134
ACTRN12619001024134已完成未知

Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Fixation in Posterior Stabilised Total Knee Replacement - a Randomised Trial

THE JOINT STUDIO0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2019年7月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100

研究概览

简要总结

ate and continuing migration was shown with cementless fixation. At 24 months mean subsidence was significantly greater for the cementless group. The cemented group had a greater degree of bone mineral density loss than the cementless group in the medial, lateral and anterior periprosthetic regions. Two tibial components were revised, both cementless. Clinical scores improved equally between groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomised controlled trial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Blinded (masking used)

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 90 Years(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • diagnosis of osteoarthritis in the knee, requiring knee replacement

排除标准

  • valgus alignment
  • osteoporosis
  • prior ipsilateral knee surgery
  • patients taking bisphosphonates, corticosteroids or cytostatic agents

研究者

发起方
THE JOINT STUDIO

相似试验

Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Fixation in... | 临床试验