Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Fixation in Posterior Stabilised Total Knee Replacement - a Randomised Trial

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: knee arthroplasty; Musculoskeletal - Osteoarthritis; implant fixation; Surgery - Surgical techniques; osteoarthritis

• Registration Number: ACTRN12619001024134
• Lead Sponsor: THE JOINT STUDIO

Brief Summary

ate and continuing migration was shown with cementless fixation. At 24 months mean subsidence was significantly greater for the cementless group. The cemented group had a greater degree of bone mineral density loss than the cementless group in the medial, lateral and anterior periprosthetic regions. Two tibial components were revised, both cementless. Clinical scores improved equally between groups.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Completion: 2017-09-25
• Study Start: 2019-07-17
• Last Update Posted: 22 July 2019

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

diagnosis of osteoarthritis in the knee, requiring knee replacement

Exclusion Criteria

valgus alignment
osteoporosis
osteopenia
prior ipsilateral knee surgery
patients taking bisphosphonates, corticosteroids or cytostatic agents

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified