跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07439393
NCT07439393尚未招募不适用

Using a Conversation Game to Engage Native American Washoe Tribe Members in Advance Care Planning: Preparation for a Clinical Trial

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center0 个研究点目标入组 108 人开始时间: 2026年6月1日最近更新:
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
108
主要终点
Arm 1: Qualitative themes describing Advance Care Planning needs, motivations, and challenges

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this study is to learn if a culturally adapted version of the Hello game, an advance care planning (ACP) conversation tool, is feasible and acceptable for use with members of the Washoe Tribe. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Can the Hello game be successfully adapted to reflect the cultural values, beliefs, and storytelling traditions of the Washoe Tribe?

Does playing the adapted Hello game increase ACP engagement and advance directive (AD) completion among Washoe Tribe members within 3 months?

Participants will:

  • Take part in talking circles at one of four Washoe reservations to share their beliefs, motivations, and experiences related to end-of-life care and advance care planning
  • Complete brief questionnaires about their ACP attitudes and behaviors
  • Play the culturally adapted Hello game in a group setting
  • Complete follow-up measures of ACP engagement and advance directive completion 3 months after playing the game

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Member of the Washoe American Indian Tribe
  • Able to attend in-person events
  • Speaks, reads, and writes in English
  • Able to provide informed consent

排除标准

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Non-Tribal member
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to provide informed consent

研究组 & 干预措施

Advance Care Planning Talking Circles

Other

干预措施: Aim 1: Talking Circles (Behavioral)

Arm 2: Modified Hello Game Play

Other

干预措施: Aim 2: Play Modified Hello Game (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Arm 1: Qualitative themes describing Advance Care Planning needs, motivations, and challenges

时间窗: During qualitative focus groups (up to 2 hours)

Participants will take part in qualitative focus groups, where they will verbally answer questions in a conversational format. These conversations will be audio recorded and qualitatively analyzed. Demographic information will be collected along with contact information. No validated survey measures will be used to collect data at this time point. Only qualitative data, demographics and contact information.

Arm 2: Initial Enrollment Subject Numbers

时间窗: RA Observed during participation in Hello game event (up to 1 hour)

Feasibility metric (Observed by Research Assistant) - How many participants actually enrolled.

Arm 2: Retention at 3-month follow-up

时间窗: RA Observed during 3-month follow-up event (up to 1 hour)

Feasibility metric (Observed by Research Assistant) - # of participants who attended the follow-up event.

Arm 2: Acceptability Score

时间窗: During participation in Hello Game Event (up to 1 hour)

Feasibility metric; participants will fill out Conversation Acceptability measure to determine acceptability of playing the Hello game. The Acceptability measure consists of 3 items; 2 items on a Likert scale from 1-7 with 1 being Strongly Agree and 7 being Strongly Disagree, and 1 item indicating likelihood of recommending conversation activity to others on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being not likely at all and 10 being extremely likely.

Arm 2: ACP engagement survey score Time 1

时间窗: During participation in Hello Game Event (up to 1 hour)

Participants will be asked to fill out the validated ACP engagement survey to determine engagement and readiness levels for ACP actions. The ACP engagement survey consists of 4 items asking questions related to readiness for ACP behaviors. 2 items are on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being "I have never thought about it" and 5 being "I already have done it". The other 2 items are on a scale of 1-6 with 1 being "I have never thought about it" and 6 being "I have already done it (more than 5 years ago)".

Arm 2: ACP engagement survey score Time 2

时间窗: 3-months post game attendance (up to 1 hour)

Participants will be asked to fill out the validated ACP engagement survey to determine engagement and readiness levels for ACP actions. The ACP engagement survey consists of 4 items asking questions related to readiness for ACP behaviors. 2 items are on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being "I have never thought about it" and 5 being "I already have done it". The other 2 items are on a scale of 1-6 with 1 being "I have never thought about it" and 6 being "I have already done it (more than 5 years ago)".

Arm 2: ACP Behavior completion

时间窗: 3-months post game attendance (up to 1 hour)

Participants will be asked to fill out the questions related to ACP behaviors. 6-items will be asked with 1 having options of yes/no/not sure/did not answer; 2 being yes/no/N/A/did not answer; 2 with options yes/no/did not answer and 1 with options nursing home/long-term care/insurance/hospice or palliative/funeral planning/other/did not report/did not answer

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lauren Van Scoy

Principal Investigator

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

相似试验