A Study Evaluating the Clinical Outcome of a Modified d'Hoore Technique for Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
- Conditions
- EnteroceleRectoceleRectal Prolapse
- Interventions
- Device: Ifabond (Péters surgical)
- Registration Number
- NCT04564677
- Lead Sponsor
- Duomed
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of a modified d'Hoore technique for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in patients with primary rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele.The goal of the study will be achieved by reporting the peri- and postoperative complications ((serious) adverse events), recurrences and re-interventions. Pre-operative to postoperative changes in pain, functional outcome and quality of life will be evaluated as well.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 150
- Female patients.
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age at study entry.
- Patient and investigator signed and dated the informed consent form prior to the index-procedure.
- Patient with primary rectal prolapse (grades I to V according to the Oxford scale), rectocele and/or enterocele.
- Patient is unable / unwilling to provide informed consent.
- Patient with recurrent rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele.
- Patient is unable to comply with the study protocol or proposed follow-up visits.
- Patient has a contra-indication for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients eligible for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy Ifabond (Péters surgical) Female patients with primary rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele eligible for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Procedural efficacy - Number of participants with (serious) adverse events Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure Number of participants with (serious) adverse events ≥ grade II Clavien-Dindo
Procedural efficacy - Number of re-interventions Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure Number of re-interventions
Procedural efficacy - Conversion rate to laparotomy during the index procedure During procedure Number of conversions to laparotomy during the index procedure
Procedural efficacy - Number of post-operative recurrences Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure Number of post-operative recurrences
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Functional score - Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) score Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure The ODS score is obtained by means of a structured 8-item questionnaire on multiple bowel symptoms. The cumulative score for all answers ranges from 0 to 31, with higher scores being indicative of more severe symptoms.
Post-operative abdominal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure Assessment of post-operative abdominal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Pre-operative abdominal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) At baseline Assessment of pre-operative abdominal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Functional score - Cleveland Clinical Incontinence Score (CCIS) Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure The CCIS is a 5-item questionnaire used to score the level of fecal incontinence. The cumulative score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores being indicative of more severe symptoms.
Quality of life - Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ) Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure The BBUSQ is a 22-item questionnaire to record data on 4 domains: constipation, evacuation, incontinence and urinary symptoms. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms.
Pre-operative vaginal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) At baseline Assessment of pre-operative vaginal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Post-operative vaginal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure Assessment of post-operative vaginal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL)
🇧🇪Genk, Belgium