MedPath

A Study Evaluating the Clinical Outcome of a Modified d'Hoore Technique for Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy

Recruiting
Conditions
Enterocele
Rectocele
Rectal Prolapse
Interventions
Device: Ifabond (Péters surgical)
Registration Number
NCT04564677
Lead Sponsor
Duomed
Brief Summary

The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of a modified d'Hoore technique for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in patients with primary rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele.The goal of the study will be achieved by reporting the peri- and postoperative complications ((serious) adverse events), recurrences and re-interventions. Pre-operative to postoperative changes in pain, functional outcome and quality of life will be evaluated as well.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female patients.
  • Patient ≥ 18 years of age at study entry.
  • Patient and investigator signed and dated the informed consent form prior to the index-procedure.
  • Patient with primary rectal prolapse (grades I to V according to the Oxford scale), rectocele and/or enterocele.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient is unable / unwilling to provide informed consent.
  • Patient with recurrent rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele.
  • Patient is unable to comply with the study protocol or proposed follow-up visits.
  • Patient has a contra-indication for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients eligible for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexyIfabond (Péters surgical)Female patients with primary rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele eligible for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Procedural efficacy - Number of participants with (serious) adverse eventsFollow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

Number of participants with (serious) adverse events ≥ grade II Clavien-Dindo

Procedural efficacy - Number of re-interventionsFollow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

Number of re-interventions

Procedural efficacy - Conversion rate to laparotomy during the index procedureDuring procedure

Number of conversions to laparotomy during the index procedure

Procedural efficacy - Number of post-operative recurrencesFollow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

Number of post-operative recurrences

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Functional score - Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) scoreFollow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

The ODS score is obtained by means of a structured 8-item questionnaire on multiple bowel symptoms. The cumulative score for all answers ranges from 0 to 31, with higher scores being indicative of more severe symptoms.

Post-operative abdominal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

Assessment of post-operative abdominal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.

Pre-operative abdominal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)At baseline

Assessment of pre-operative abdominal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.

Functional score - Cleveland Clinical Incontinence Score (CCIS)Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

The CCIS is a 5-item questionnaire used to score the level of fecal incontinence. The cumulative score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores being indicative of more severe symptoms.

Quality of life - Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ)Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

The BBUSQ is a 22-item questionnaire to record data on 4 domains: constipation, evacuation, incontinence and urinary symptoms. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms.

Pre-operative vaginal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)At baseline

Assessment of pre-operative vaginal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.

Post-operative vaginal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Follow-up 4: 36 months after the procedure

Assessment of post-operative vaginal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL)

🇧🇪

Genk, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath