跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05140733
NCT05140733已完成不适用

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Between Lumbar Foraminotomy and Lumbar Single or Double Levels Fusion Surgery in Patients With Foraminal Stenosis

Seoul National University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 52 人开始时间: 2021年8月22日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
52
试验地点
1
主要终点
Cost-effectiveness

研究概览

简要总结

The present study was to see the effect of minimally invasive neural foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis with unilateral radicular pain. Traditionally, fusion was was done for the patients, but recent development enable surgeon to decompress neural foramen without rigid spinal fusion. Although, clinical effect of neural foraminotomy may have limitation in attaining a comparable result to fusion surgery, a cost-effective analysis may reveal a result in a different perspective. In this regard, we designed a prospective cohort study to see the cost-effectiveness of neural foraminotomy compared to fusion surgery.

详细描述

Control: 1-2 levels fusion surgery Intervention: neural foraminotomy

Inclusion patients between 40 - 100 years. No improvement despite nonsurgical treatment for more than 3 months. No history of lumbar fusion surgery Single or double-level lumbar foraminal stenosis with corresponding leg pain

Exclusion Severe neurological deficit (motor grade less than Grade III) Combined inflammatory joint disease Combined neurodegenerative disease such as Parkinson's disease or dementia Combined cancer, traumatic fracture marked spinal deformity (C7 sagittal vertical axis > 10cm)

Surgery and follow-up Patients underwent foraminotomy and visits outpatient clinical at determined time points (postoperative month 1, 6, 12 and 24 months) Their clinical outcomes were recorded at each visit. Their medical costs were retrieved at the time of analysis by using hospital records.

Statistical analysis means: T-test

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Cost-effectiveness

时间窗: postoperative 2 years

cost to increased one quality adjusted life year (QALY) after surgical treatment

次要结局

  • Numeric rating scale(NRS) of pain on back (NRS-B) and legs (NRS-L)(postoperative 2 years.)
  • Oswestry disability index (ODI)(postoperative 2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Chi Heon Kim

Professor

Seoul National University Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of cost-effectiveness between two surgical procedures (anterior or posterior decompression) in patients with cervical nerve root entrapmentEnglish: cost-effectiveness, radiculopathy, foraminotomy, discectomy, randomized controlled trial, cervical spineDutch: kosten-effectiviteit, radiculopathie, foraminotomie, discectomie, randomized controlled trial, cervicale wervelkolom
NL-OMON24269niversity Medical Center Groningen308
已完成
不适用
Cost-effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy(FOR) versus anterior cervical discotomy with fusion (ACDF) for cervical soft/osteophytic disc disease. A randomized controlled multicenter study. FACET study (Foraminotomy Acdf Cost-Effectiveness Trial)cervical radicular syndrome (CRS)cervicobrachialgia.10019190
NL-OMON47024niversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen308
已完成
4 期
Cost-effectiveness of minimal invasive spinal fusion compared to open fusion for patients with spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain.low back painNeurogenic claudicationradicular leg pain100232131004154310009720
NL-OMON41403eids Universitair Medisch Centrum340
招募中
不适用
Cost-effectiveness of minimal invasive spinal fusion compared to open fusion for patients with spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain.
NL-OMON23242eiden University Medical Center340
尚未招募
Unknown
FusiOn veRsus bEst coNServatIve Care (the FORENSIC-Australia trial)
ACTRN12624001062516The University of Queensland270