Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06644963
NCT06644963
Recruiting
N/A

IMPELLA, Complications and Tolerance

University Hospital, Montpellier1 site in 1 country800 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2010

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiogenic Shock
Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Enrollment
800
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Hemocompatibility related adverse events (HRAEs)
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and devices like Impella® CP and Impella 5.0-5.5 are often used for hemodynamic support, either alone or combined with veno-arterial ECMO (ECMELLA). While recent studies suggest improved survival with Impella® in cardiogenic shock, complications remain common, particularly due to deep arterial access and the need for anticoagulation. Hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) such as ischemia, bleeding (44%), hemolysis (32%), and stroke (13%) frequently occur. Achieving hemocompatibility between the patient's blood and the device is challenging, as pump flow, anticoagulation, and patient factors contribute to both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Despite advances, further research is required to better understand and reduce these risks in clinical practice.

Detailed Description

Myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. To provide hemodynamic support in these cases, intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist devices, such as Impella® CP and Impella 5.0-5.5, are frequently used, either alone in cardiogenic shock (CS) or in combination with veno-arterial ECMO (known as ECMELLA) for left ventricular unloading. Recent observational studies and randomized controlled trials have suggested improved survival rates with the use of Impella® in cardiogenic shock patients. Despite the growing use of these devices, complications in clinical practice remain frequent. Due to the need for deep arterial access (14F for Impella CP and 21F for Impella 5.0) via femoral or axillary routes, as well as the necessity of anticoagulation, hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) such as ischemic complications and bleeding are common, occurring in 18% and 44% of patients, respectively. Hemolysis has been reported in up to 32% of cases, while stroke affects up to 13%. Other less frequent complications include device deployment issues, pump thrombosis, implant site infections, and sepsis, all contributing to increased healthcare costs. Achieving hemocompatibility between the patient's blood and the device remains a significant challenge despite advances in Impella technology. Balancing prothrombotic and prohemorrhagic forces at the blood/device interface is complex. This interface activates the coagulation cascade, generating a prothrombotic state, damaging von Willebrand multimers, and leading to hemolysis. The interplay of pump flow, pump speed, patient risk factors, and clinical management (anticoagulation) further complicates hemocompatibility, often resulting in thrombotic or bleeding events such as hemorrhagic stroke, circuit clots, or ischemic stroke. Although the occurrence of HRAEs is well documented, particularly in the case of severe events like stroke, there is still an incomplete understanding of the factors driving these complications in modern clinical practice. Further research is needed to better delineate the risk factors and improve outcomes for patients receiving Impella support.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2010
End Date
January 30, 2025
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients admitted for cardiogenic shock supported by Impella (5, 5.5 or CP) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022 (as an isolated circulatory support or combined with others Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Absence of Impella
  • Impella 2.5
  • Impella RP (right)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Hemocompatibility related adverse events (HRAEs)

Time Frame: From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month

Incidence of HRAEs with Impella (CP and/or 5 - 5.5) : Bleeding events (BARC \>3b) and Thrombosis events ( ischemic stroke + pump thrombosis)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Early mortality(From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month)
  • Adverse events related to Impella devices(From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge assessed up to 3 month)
  • Duration of mechanical ventilation(From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month)
  • Lengh of stay(From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 month)
  • Cardiac long-term project(From start of hospitalization until hospital discharge assessed up to 3 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials