Effect of Holmich Protocol and Myofascial Release Technique on Groin Pain in Tennis Players
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 22
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Hip Range of motion
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of Homlich Protocol and Myofacial release technique on groin pain in tennis players. A total of 14 players will be included in the clinical trail. There will be one group of 7 players in which Holmich protocol will be applied while in the other group of 7 players will be given Myofascial Release Technique which includes Transverse friction massage and Stretching. Data will be collected by outcome measures before and after the exercise protocol is given. Treatment will be administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of Holmich Protocol each session is about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes will be asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions. While passive treatment will be given for 30 mins per session. During the treatment course and before the final evaluation, no athletic activity will be permitted . Injuries data will be collected prospectively by respective coaches. Coaches will be trained for identification and classification of injuries.
Detailed Description
Groin pain arising from sports injuries is widespread, especially among those who participate in sports that involve repetitive rotational movements such as kicking and turning as in soccer. This type of injury is the fourth most common sports injury, with soccer players suffering from long-term symptoms and frequent relapses. The injury rate is 1.015-1.133 per 1000 hours of play, which is equivalent to 11%-16% of all sports injuries. The prognosis for exercise- related groin pain is not clear. Injured athletes may be forced to wait a long time before returning to sports activity free of restriction.
It is known that adductor-related groin injuries are the most common cause of groin injury, accounting for 69% of groin injuries in football and 58% across all forms of sport. As limited range of hip abduction and hip internal rotation and decreased hip adductor strength (absolute and comparative to the hip abductors) are considered potential risk factors for groin injury. Adductor-related groin pain is often treated without surgery. Among different conservative approaches, it appears that exercise therapy (ET) is more effective than other conservative treatment methods such as electrotherapy, manual therapy or steroid injections. Unfortunately, however, many important factors including frequency, duration and the exact amount of resistance or perceived exertion to be used in the ET protocols have not been carefully recorded in clinical trials. To our best knowledge, the randomised clinical trial carried out by Holmich et al in 1999 still offers the best evidence for the effectiveness of exercise as a prescription for the treatment of adductor-related groin pain. Holmich et al collated the results of ET (based on isometric and isotonic strengthening of the hip abductor/adductor and the abdominal muscles) with results from physiotherapy. They evaluated successful treatment (based on pain measures), patients' subjective global assessments and their return to sport without groin pain at the same level as before the injury. 'Successful treatment' as described in their study is an unfeasible and non-validated measure for evaluating outcome; on the other hand, the published results by Holmich et al was not compared with any such other treatment.
Yousefzadeh A et al conducted a study which checked the effect of Holmich Protocol on groin pain and its results showed to be an effective treatment.
Weir A et al performed multi modal treatment(MMT) in comparison to exercise therapy(ET), results showed MMT to be more effective then ET.
Sernar A et al did a systemic review on treatment of groin players which showed low quality studies present for groin injury management.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 35 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- Male
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Male Gender
- •Age: 18 - 35 years
- •Groin pain for at least 2 months
- •3 - 7 pain score on NPRS
- •Playing Sports for atleast 1 year
Exclusion Criteria
- •Femoral or inguinal hernia
- •Chronic urinary tract disorder or prostatitis
- •Disease, fracture of the pelvis or the lower limbs inhibiting the participant from the completing the treatment plan
- •Entrapment of the genitofemoral or back pain felt between T10 and L5 levels and consisting of the facet joints
- •Virulent Ilioinguinal nerve
- •Inability to follow the active physical training plan
- •Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the study
- •Participation in principled strength training of the hip adductors for more than once a week in the 6 months prior to the study.
Arms & Interventions
Holmich Protocol
Treatment will be administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of each session was about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes were asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions
Intervention: Holmich Protocol (Procedure)
Myofascial Release Technique
Treatment wiil be given twice a week as individual treatment by the physiotherapist. The duration of treatment is about 30 min.
Intervention: Myofascial Release Technique (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Hip Range of motion
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
The hip range of motion including abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation in 90°of flexion will be measured by an adjustable goniometer.
T-Agility TEST
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
Set out four cones 5 yards = 4.57 m, 10 yards = 9.14 m. The subject starts at cone A. On the command of the timer, the subject sprints to cone B and touches the base of the cone with their right hand. They then turn left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and also touches its base, this time with their left hand. Then shuffling sideways to the right to cone D and touching the base with the right hand. They then shuffle back to cone B touching with the left hand, and run backwards to cone A. The stopwatch is stopped as they pass cone A
Edgren Side Test (ESST)
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
Five cones or lines are placed in a line, three feet apart (12 feet total between the two outside cones). The starting position is at the centre cone, facing forward with feet straddling the center line. At the command 'go', the participant sidesteps to the right until their right foot touches or crosses the outside cone or tape mark. The participant then sidesteps to the left until their left foot touches or crosses the left outside cone or tape mark. The participant sidesteps back and forth to the outside cones as rapidly as possible for 10 seconds.
Triple Hop Test (THT)
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
In the triple hop test, the aim is to jump as far as possible on a single leg three consecutive times, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.
Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
The visual analog scale (VAS) scores are based on self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale-"no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm). The values can be used to track pain progression for a patient or to compare pain between patients with similar conditions.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported