Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03460665
NCT03460665CompletedNot Applicable

Symptomatic Efficacy of Microparticle Arterial Embolization in Knee Osteoarthritis Resistant to Medical Treatment: Randomized Prospective Study Versus Placebo

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice4 sites in 1 country18 target enrollmentStarted: October 4, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
18
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
VAS : Change of pain of the Knee injury

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this double-blind, randomized, single-center prospective study (patient and evaluator) is to evaluate the efficacy of arterial occlusion (embolization) of neovessels by microparticle versus placebo on pain in disabling knee osteoarthritis at 12 months.

Detailed Description

Rational: in the normal state, the articular cartilage is devoid of vessels and innervation. In osteoarthritic cartilage, neovascularization is observed and is accompanied by a sensitive neoinnervation. The development of these neovessels also contributes to the structural damage of cartilage by achieving a real "perforation"of the cartilage. Studies designate neovascularization as a target for new therapeutic. In two non-comparative open-label studies, a Japanese team has shown that endovascular occlusion of these neovessels in patients with knee osteoarthritis significantly reduced the patient pain without any complication.

The aim of this double-blind, randomized, single-center prospective study (patient and evaluator) is to evaluate the efficacy of arterial occlusion (embolization) of neovessels by microparticle versus placebo on pain in disabling knee osteoarthritis at 12 months.

The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of embolization on the pain of patients with disabling osteoarthritis by double-blind comparison of two groups: the first control group will include patients who will benefit from arteriography and an injection of saline in their neovessels, the second group called treatment will consist of patients whose neovessels will be occluded by inert microparticles of 75 µm. The pain will be evaluated in both groups before and 12 months after embolisation. The objective is to show that the pain is significantly less important in the group of patients whose neovessels have been occluded with microparticles in comparison to the control group.

Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness of neovascular embolization on pain at 1, 6, 24 and 36 months; knee stiffness, physical activity, quality of life, at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months; the structural course of knee osteoarthritis at 12, 24 and 36 months; the use of arthroplasty at 24 and 36 months.

Study Population: Patients aged 40 to 80 years with knee osteoarthritis with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score greater than or equal to 50 mm for at least 3 months optimal medical treatment, whose radiological stage of osteoarthritis according to Kellgren and Lawence is 2 or 3 and does not have a knee prosthesis surgical indication.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
40 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • An effective contraceptive system for women of childbearing age, a pregnancy test will be offered to these women in the preoperative assessment.
  • Obtaining the signature of the consent to participate in the study
  • Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2-3 assessed by routine weight-bearing knee radiographs on the most affected knee in bilateral cases
  • Pain with EVA ≥ 50 mm evolving for at least 3 months despite the start of a well-conducted medical treatment according to current recommendations including analgesics, NSAID, intra-articular injections, rehabilitation and weight loss
  • No surgical indication retained

Exclusion Criteria

  • Serious visceral failure
  • Local infection
  • Arthropathy secondary to chronic inflammatory rheumatism (rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthritis) or microcrystalline rheumatism
  • History of surgery on the studied knee, except arthroscopy for more than 6 months
  • Gonarthrosis with KL score> 3
  • Osteonecrosis of one of the bones of the knee joint on the MRI
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Allergy to contrast products
  • Chronic or acute renal failure (clearance <30 ml / min)
  • Haemostasis disorders (blood platelet count <50,000 / mm3 or patient ACT / control ACT> 1,2 or PT <50%)
  • Operative indication of placement of a prosthesis

Arms & Interventions

Microparticles

Experimental

arteriography and an injection of inert microparticles of 75 µm in neovessels

Intervention: Arteriography (Procedure)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

knee arteriography and injection of saline solution in neovessels

Intervention: Arteriography (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

VAS : Change of pain of the Knee injury

Time Frame: before intervention and one month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months after intervention

change in the Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI).

Secondary Outcomes

  • EQ-5D questionnaire(at 1, 6, 12 and 36 month after intervention)
  • Knee X-Ray(15 days before embolization and 12, 24, 36 month after)
  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)(at 1,6, 24, 36 month after intervention)
  • Knee MRI(15 days before embolization and 12 month after)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials