MedPath

Spinal Cord Stimulation Pioneering Analgesia for Resilient Recovery in Post Intra-Thoracic Surgery Pain

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Pain, Postoperative
Neuropathic Pain
Interventions
Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation
Registration Number
NCT06390150
Lead Sponsor
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Brief Summary

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in patients with post intra-thoracic surgery pain syndrome in a placebo-controlled, crossover, randomized clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Post intra-Thoracic surgery Pain Syndrome (PTPS) is a debilitating condition marked by persistent neuropathic pain in the surgical incision area for at least 2 months after the initial procedure. Proper pain control is instrumental in allowing patients to ambulate and breathe normally, without the need for splinting, and to take deep breaths necessary for effective coughing. The most common surgeries leading to PTPS are video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and (open) thoracotomy. The prevalence of PTPS has been reported between 5-70%, underscoring the high risk of severe chronic postoperative pain associated with thoracic surgery. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), known for its efficacy in neuropathic pain of any origin, emerges as a potential solution. SCS can be regarded as an effective, safe, well-tolerated, and reversible treatment for severe drug-refractory neuropathic pain. While chronic pain guidelines strongly recommend SCS for certain conditions, such as persistent pain following spinal surgery, it is not typically listed as an option for PTPS. SCS appears promising for treating PTPS, particularly when a patient is resistant to other treatments and driven by neuropathic mechanisms. The potential for sustained pain relief, improved quality of life, and the prospect of reducing or discontinuing medication suggest that SCS may significantly impact the daily lives of individuals suffering from PTPS. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of SCS, which involves the placement of an implantable pulse generator connected to electrodes with leads that stimulate the spinal cord, in patients with PTPS. The hypothesis is that SCS leads to a reduction from baseline in the severity of pain in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, as well as an improvement in quality of life.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of post intra-thoracic surgery pain syndrome
  • Medically fit for neurosurgery
  • Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous spinal cord stimulation
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric comorbidities and substance abuse
  • Electrical or other devices that preclude implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device
  • Lack of informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Stimulation OffSpinal Cord StimulationSpinal cord stimulators will be optimized to each participant as in the experimental arm, and then programmed to deliver no stimulation for 6 weeks.
Stimulation OnSpinal Cord StimulationSpinal cord stimulators will be optimized to each participant and then programmed to deliver high frequency stimulation below detectable threshold for 6 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensityBaseline and at 4, 10, 16, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery

The primary outcome is the self-reported difference in change from baseline of the severity of pain quantified in the Numerical Rating Scale. This will be assessed at baseline (pre-surgery) and at regular follow-up appointments.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in score on Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline and at 4, 10, 16, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery

Assesses a patient's quality of life in relation to back pain on a 10-section questionnaire. A low score indicates no disability and a high score indicates severe disability.

Change in score on EuroQol 5 Dimension QuestionnaireBaseline and at 4, 10, 16, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery

Assesses overall quality of life in five dimensions including mobility, self-care, daily routine, pain, and anxiety/depression. A low score indicates poor health and a high score indicates excellent health.

Change in morphine equivalents usedBaseline and at 4, 10, 16, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery

Measures patient pain by assessing the amount of pain medication taken by a patient. Higher usage indicates a greater level of pain and a lower usage indicates a lower level of pain.

Change in score on the 12-item Short Form SurveyBaseline and at 4, 10, 16, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery

Assesses how a patient's health impacts their quality of life. A higher score indicates a better quality of life, and a low score indicates a poorer quality of life.

Change in score on the Brief Pain Inventory Short FormBaseline and at 4, 10, 16, 26, and 52 weeks post-surgery

Assesses the impact of pain on a patient's quality of life. A high score indicates a severe impact and a lower score indicates minimal impact.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Queen Elizabeth Health Science Centre

🇨🇦

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath