Comparaison of ESP Block and TAP Block
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Post Operative Pain
- Interventions
- Procedure: ESP BlockProcedure: TAP Block
- Registration Number
- NCT04176770
- Lead Sponsor
- Mongi Slim Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study aim to compare the efficiency and the analgesic effect of Erector Spinal Plane Block versus TAP Block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Detailed Description
This study will include patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ASA status 1 or 2. patients will be randomized in 2 groups to recieve post operative analgesia with -ESP block: bilateral injection of 20 ml of isobaric Bupivacain 0,375% in the paraverebral space T5.
or
-TAP block: bilateral injection of 15 ml of Isobaric Bupivacain 0,5%
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
- Adult patients
- ASA status I or II
- scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Exclusion Criteria
- laparotomy
- unplanned ICU admission
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ESP group ESP Block ESP block: bilateral injection of 20 ml of isobaric Bupivacain 0,375% in the paraverebral space T5. TAP Block TAP Block TAP block: bilateral injection of 15 ml of Isobaric Bupivacain 0,5%
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Post Operative analgesia 24 hours after intervention Post operative analgesia assessed with Numerical rating scale (0=minimum, 10= Maximum)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method post operative analgesic consumption 24 hours after intervention Amount of Morphin needed for analgesia
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mongi Slim Hospital
🇹🇳Tunis, Tunisia