MedPath

Comparaison of ESP Block and TAP Block

Not Applicable
Conditions
Post Operative Pain
Registration Number
NCT04176770
Lead Sponsor
Mongi Slim Hospital
Brief Summary

This study aim to compare the efficiency and the analgesic effect of Erector Spinal Plane Block versus TAP Block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed Description

This study will include patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ASA status 1 or 2. patients will be randomized in 2 groups to recieve post operative analgesia with -ESP block: bilateral injection of 20 ml of isobaric Bupivacain 0,375% in the paraverebral space T5.

or

-TAP block: bilateral injection of 15 ml of Isobaric Bupivacain 0,5%

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult patients
  • ASA status I or II
  • scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Exclusion Criteria
  • laparotomy
  • unplanned ICU admission

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post Operative analgesia24 hours after intervention

Post operative analgesia assessed with Numerical rating scale (0=minimum, 10= Maximum)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
post operative analgesic consumption24 hours after intervention

Amount of Morphin needed for analgesia

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mongi Slim Hospital

🇹🇳

Tunis, Tunisia

Mongi Slim Hospital
🇹🇳Tunis, Tunisia

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.