Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04650958
NCT04650958
Unknown
Not Applicable

Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Isolated Generalized or Segmental Dystonia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Parallel-group Trial

Ruijin Hospital1 site in 1 country38 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2021
ConditionsDystonia

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dystonia
Sponsor
Ruijin Hospital
Enrollment
38
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The change from baseline to 3 months after stimulation of Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) score
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Dystonia is a group of movement disorders characterized by twisting, repetitive movements, or abnormal postures caused by involuntary muscle contractions and is characterized by a young age of onset and a high disability rate. Early intervention can reduce disability incidence, improve the patient's quality of life, and reduce the burden on families and society. Multiple international guidelines on dystonia have found deep brain stimulation (DBS) to be a safe and effective treatment for refractory dystonia. The globus pallidal internus (GPi) is the mostly widely used target for dystonia. However, there are limitations on the GPi DBS treatment, including slow onset of beneficial effects, poor improvement of axis symptoms, and potential stimulation-related side effects. Previous studies have described the highly successful use of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) in patients with refractory dystonia, suggesting that STN DBS is an effective and persisting alternative to pallidal deep brain stimulation. However, all STN DBS treated cases have been analyzed in open-label uncontrolled cohort studies, leading to limited data with a high level of evidence on the STN DBS in dystonia. Further, the investigators hypothesized STN has potentially more effectiveness when compared with GPi, and may be more power-saving and quick-acting. In this study, the investigators will organize a prospective randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing active versus sham stimulation in isolated segmental or generalized dystonia to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of STN DBS by measuring the impact on motor status, mental status, quality of life, the rate of response of the patients (the number of patients with ≥30% improvement in the movement score on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) and the rate of adverse events during the trial.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2021
End Date
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Bomin Sun

Director of Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Ruijin Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must meet criteria for the diagnosis of isolated generalized or segmental dystonia, including idiopathic and inherited dystonia, as defined by the Phenomenology and Classification of Dystonia: A Consensus Update 2013;
  • Patients will be ≥ 14 years old;
  • The course of disease will be ≥ 3 years;
  • Patients will have:
  • Significant dystonia symptoms;
  • Compromised life quality;
  • Unsatisfactory response to oral treatment with anticholinergic agents antiepileptic agents, anti-dopamine agents, dopaminergic agents, or muscle relaxants;
  • Unsatisfactory response to or contraindication for previous botulinum toxin treatment; and
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis or probable diagnosis of acquired, compound, and complex dystonia, as defined by the Phenomenology and Classification of Dystonia: A Consensus Update 2013;
  • Previous brain surgery for dystonia;
  • Patients with cognitive impairment (MMSE score \<24) or moderate-severe depressive disorder (BDI\>25);
  • Patients with marked brain atrophy identified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT);
  • Patients with other medical or psychiatric comorbidities that could increase the surgical risk or interfere with completion of the trial;
  • Patients with increased bleeding risk, or other factors contraindicating neurosurgery or general anesthesia;
  • Patients unable to cooperate with the assessments during the follow-up.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The change from baseline to 3 months after stimulation of Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) score

Time Frame: Baseline; 3months after stimulation

The scale consists of a movement and disability subscale with scores ranging from 0 to 120 and 0 to 30, respectively, higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI)(Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation)
  • Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)(Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation)
  • 36-item Short-Form General Health survey (SF-36)(Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation)
  • The rate of response(1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation)
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)(Baseline; 3months after stimulation)
  • Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)(Baseline; 3months after stimulation)
  • Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS)(1 week and 1 month after stimulation)
  • Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)(Baseline; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation)
  • The rate of adverse event (AE)(Within 1 week after surgery; 1 week, 1 month and 3months after stimulation)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials