跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02180854
NCT02180854已完成不适用

Correlation Between Monitoring Frequency and Clinical Deterioration in Hospitalized Patients

Bispebjerg Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 600 人开始时间: 2014年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
600
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of patients with an EWS >/= 2

研究概览

简要总结

Acute deterioration among hospitalised patient can result in serious adverse events like cardiac arrest, unexpected death or unanticipated intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Most events are preceeded by deteriorating vital signs, and potentially avoidable.

To detect and treat hospitalised at-risk patients early an early warning score (EWS) was introduced at the investigator site. EWS measures of a number of physiological parameters that are aggregated to a common score, that directs monitoring frequency, clinical interventions and competency of the provider.

Patients with low scores (0 - 1) are monitored every 12th hour and seldom experience serious adverse events. The optimal monitoring frequency for this group is unknown, and presently based on a compromise between patient safety and work load issues.

The aim of the present study is to explore if an 8 hourly monitoring interval (intervention) is correlated with a better outcome than 12 hour intervals (control), based on the number of patients that deteriorate to a higher EWS 24 hours after hospital admission in each group.

详细描述

Acute deterioration among hospitalised patient can result in serious adverse events like cardiac arrest, unexpected death or unanticipated intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Most events are preceeded by deteriorating vital signs, and potentially avoidable.

To detect and treat hospitalised patients at risk of clinical deterioration in a timely manner, an early warning score (EWS) was introduced at the investigator site. EWS includes measures for respiratory rate, arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation, pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, level of consciousness according to AVPU score, temperature, and whether a patient receives supplementary oxygen. Each vital sign can be assigned between 0 to 3 points (supplementary oxygen 0 or 2) depending on how much it deviates from a predefined threshold; the values are added to an aggregated score from 0 to 20, higher scores indicating more severe disease. An escalation protocol that directs the type of clinical response and competency of the provider according to EWS triggers was also introduced as an integrated part of the system.

Patients with low scores (0 - 1) are monitored every 12th hour and seldom experience serious adverse events. The optimal monitoring frequency for this group is unknown, and presently based on a compromise between patient safety and work load issues.

The aim of the present study is to explore if an 8 hourly monitoring interval (intervention) is correlated with a better outcome than 12 hour intervals (control) in the group of patients that have an EWS of 0 or 1 on admission. Deterioration is based on the number of patients that deteriorate to a higher EWS 24 hours after the first EWS is measured. Since serious adverse events in this population are rare the primary outcome is clinical deterioration defined as number of patients with elevated EWS >/= 2 in each group, 24 hours after admission to the hospital.

This is a cluster-randomized, non-blinded, pragmatic, interventional study of acutely admitted, adult patients to surgical or medical wards at our hospital.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • first EWS on admission = 0 or 1
  • age >/ = 18 years

排除标准

  • chronically elevated EWS
  • terminal disease and comfort care only
  • conditions that warrant closer observation according to hospital guidelines

结局指标

主要结局

Number of patients with an EWS >/= 2

时间窗: 24 hours after first EWS after admission

Clinical deterioration is correlated to elevated EWS

次要结局

  • EWS >/ = 2(48 hours)
  • Number of serious adverse events during first 72 hours of admission(72 hours)
  • Length of hospital stay(30 days)
  • Number of patients with an aggregated score of EWS >/= 5 or >/= 7(24 to 48 hours)
  • Mortality(72 hours and 30 days)
  • Number of patients with an individual score of EWS >/= 3(24 to 48 hours after first EWS on admission)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

John Asger Petersen

M.D., Consultant in Critical Care Medicine

Bispebjerg Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验