CTRI/2024/05/067270尚未招募不适用
Comparison of Channeled versus non-Channeled blade of video laryngoscope for emergency endotracheal intubation: A randomized clinical study.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The primary outcome will be time to endotracheal intubation.
研究概览
简要总结
| Endotracheal Intubation is a life-saving procedure performed in emergency departments (EDs) across the globe. Under some circumstances, it has been found that; it seems pretty much impossible to align the axes, making direct visualization of the laryngeal inlet difficult or impossible with direct laryngoscopy and there by proving it to be a futile one. But the most detrimental part of this we lose a patient due to unnecessary delay in intubation. So, these cases present as a particularly challenging situation for emergency physicians and there what the video laryngoscopes does come into action. The faster intubation time escalating the ease of intubation in video laryngoscopes. The first pass success rate of video intubation rely on cumulative factors i.e blade size, blade type, design, structural configurations, angulation of blade (obtuse /acute. It is generally accepted that using a video laryngoscope is associated with an improved visualization of the glottis. However, correctly placing the endotracheal tube might be challenging. Channelled video laryngoscopy blades have an endotracheal tube already pre-loaded, allowing to advance the tube once the glottis is visualized. We hypothesized that use of a channel blade with pre-loaded endotracheal tube results in a faster intubation, compared to a curved Macintosh blade video laryngoscope. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled study has examined the relative performance of Chanell blade with that non-Chanell blade of video laryngoscope in emergency set up for tracheal intubation. The aim of the study was to compare the emergency tracheal intubation performances of the video laryngoscope non channelled blade with that Chanell blade in the emergency department. |
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 85.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Critically ill patients requiring emergency intubation on arrival.
排除标准
- •1.cardiac arrest intubations 2.hyperkalaemia 3.burn and crush injuries 4.Pregnant patients.
结局指标
主要结局
The primary outcome will be time to endotracheal intubation.
时间窗: At baseline, 1 minute,2minutes,5 minutes, 10 minutes
次要结局
- Secondary outcomes include, success rate of intubation in first attempt and incidence of esophageal intubation and airway related complications like blood in the oral cavity, dental trauma.(At baseline, 1 minute,2minutes,5 minutes, 10 minutes)
研究者
Dr Sangeeta Sahoo
AIIMS Bhubaneswar
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
招募中
不适用
To study how easy it is to insert a breathing tube (Endotracheal tube) and how well we can see the breathing tract using two different toolsCTRI/2024/09/073736Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College King Edward Memorial Hospital118
尚未招募
4 期
Use of different method of head position for securing airway in patient with difficult airwayCTRI/2025/09/094231Maria Robinson I264
尚未招募
不适用
"Comparing Methods for Safer Intubation in Obese Patients: Ultrasound vs. Capnography and chest auscultation "CTRI/2024/10/075953Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute40
尚未招募
不适用
Personalized Selection of Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Videolaryngoscope BladesNCT07370883Seoul National University Hospital524
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of the clinical performance of two airway securing devices (McCoy Laryngoscope and CMAC D Blade videolaryngoscope) in patients who require fast airway securing and neck immobilisation while undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia .CTRI/2025/08/092318Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care GMCH Chandigarh110