Comparison of Regional Block, Caudal Block and Wound Infiltration in Inguinal Hernitomy
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Interventions
- Procedure: regional blockProcedure: Caudal blockProcedure: Epidural
- Registration Number
- NCT06386250
- Lead Sponsor
- King Edward Medical University
- Brief Summary
Background: Although Inguinal herniotomy in children is taken as a day care procedure, post-operative pain management still remain controversial in these cases and superiority of wound infiltration, caudal block or regional block over each isn't known.
Objective: The objective of the study was compare regional block, caudal block and wound infiltration for post-operative pain management in children undergoing inguinal herniotomy
- Detailed Description
Three hundred patients rom the department of pediatric surgery, KEMU/Mayo Hospital, were randomized in three study groups by a computer generated table. Regional block group (Group A), wound infiltration group (Group B), caudal block group (Group C). . Patients were assessed for postoperative pain intensity using FLACC pain scale at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hours after surgery in children less than 8 years of age. Wong-Baker Faces pain Scale at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hours after surgery in children more than 8 years of age. Patients were discharged after 24 hours. If pain score ≥ 4 was given intravenously, Ketoralac. Urinary retention was observed after 24 hours, wound infection was observed after 7 days.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
- Both Male and female inguinal hernia patients
- Patients from 3-12 years age Exclusion Criteria
- History of allergy to any drugs used in study documented on history .Infection at the site of regional, caudal or local infiltration, documented on clinical examination.
.Irreducible, obstructed or strangulated hernia, documented on clinical examination.
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A Epidural In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000. Group C Caudal block In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1. Group A regional block In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000. Group A Caudal block In group A, iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves were blocked by using 0.25% bupivacaine 2ml/kg of combined with skin infiltration of adrenaline 1:200 000. Group B regional block In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site. Group C regional block In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1. Group B Caudal block In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site. Group B Epidural In group B 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5ml/Kg was infiltrated at the surgical site. Group C Epidural In group C 0.25% Bupivacaine 1ml /kg was given into epidural space at L4-L5 or L5-S1.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative pain intensity 24 hours Patients were assessed for postoperative pain intensity using FLACC pain scale at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hours after surgery in children less than 8 years of age. Wong-Baker Faces pain Scale at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hours after surgery in children more than 8 years of age.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Muhammad Sharif
🇵🇰Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan