To clinically, radiographically and histologically compare the preservation of tooth socket using autogenous tooth bone graft versus synthetic bone graft.
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/10/021610
- Lead Sponsor
- Anuva Bhandari
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
i. Patients willing to give informed consent for extraction followed by dental implant.
ii. Patients with good compliance so as to meet follow-ups
iii. Single rooted teeth in both maxillary and mandibular arches
iv. Teeth with poor prognosis (endodontically or periodontically compromised)
v. Systemically healthy patients
vi. Alveolar sockets with intact four wall architecture and depth >5mm
i. Patients with age group >60 years of age
ii. Patients with systemic and autoimmune diseases
iii. Pregnant or lactating women
iv. Root canal treated teeth
v. Patient undergoing or who have undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the last 12 months
vi. Patients with para-functional habits
vii. Alcoholics, drug abusers and heavy smokers
viii. Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method regeneration of bone would be evaluated in both the groups.Timepoint: at 6 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method histological evaluation would be done to check for new bone formationTimepoint: at 6 months