MedPath

The Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of ANIMERS Chiara LA and JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® for Aging Mid-Face

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hyaluronic Acid
Lidocaine
Dermal Filler
Aging Mid-Face
Interventions
Device: ANIMERS Chiara LA
Device: JUVÉDERM VOLUMA®
Registration Number
NCT04622085
Lead Sponsor
SciVision Biotech Inc.
Brief Summary

This study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness for the correction of aging mid-face of treatment group compared with the active control group.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age 30 to 60 years of male or female
  2. MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) of midface graded 2 to 5 by evaluator.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Injection site with infection or other skin diseases present which may affect the evaluation
  2. With medical history of chromatosis, discoloration, keloid formation, hypertrophic scarring at midface
  3. With permanent implants or planning to receive permanent implants during the study period at the injection sites
  4. Hyaluronate facial dermal implant injection or other impermanent dermal fillers injection at injection sites within the past 6 months
  5. With under-eye facial Botox or fat injection within the past 6 months or planning to receive under-eye facial Botox or fat injection during the study period
  6. With Major surgery 3 months before the start of the trial
  7. With under-eye facial chemical or lasers peeling, non-invasive skin tightening, thermocool within the past 3 months or planning to receive these aesthetic procedures during the study period
  8. With systemic immunosuppressive therapy or systemic corticosteroids within the past 2 months or planning to receive these therapies during the study period (subjects who have received inhaled/intranasal corticosteroids could be considered to include.)
  9. With clinical meaningful coagulation disorders, underdoing anticoagulant treatment or within the past 10 days, or taking blood circulation promotion and blood stasis movement medications
  10. With epilepsy or porphyria
  11. With congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia or glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  12. With analgesic dependence, analgesics within the past 2 weeks or planning to receive analgesics during the study period
  13. With history of hypersensitivity or allergy to lidocaine, amide anesthetics, hyaluronic acid or any component of the device; Gram-positive bacterial or Streptococcus proteins; other severe hypersensitivity history unsuitable for participating in the study
  14. Planning to undergo any surgery which may cause significant body weight change (such as bariatric surgery) or take any medication which may cause significant body weight change
  15. Pregnant, planning pregnancy or in breastfeeding females
  16. Participated in clinical study of other device or drug and have not terminated within the past 30 days -Other circumstances which judged to be unsuitable for participating in the study by the investigator

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ANIMERS Chiara LAANIMERS Chiara LA-
JUVÉDERM VOLUMA®JUVÉDERM VOLUMA®-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Response rate of a ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS)6 months post-injection

The response rate is ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) as assessed by the evaluator at 6 months.

Evaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale (MFVDS) on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MFVDS value evaluated by blinded-evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection

Evaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.

A Response rate of MFVDS value evaluated by blinded-evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection

The response rate is ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of the MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) as assessed by the evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.

Evaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale (MFVDS) on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.

GAIS evaluated photographically by blinded-evaluator after injection and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection

Evaluators and subjects assess the improvement of correction with 5 graded scale,1 to 5 was represented 'exceptional improvement' to 'worsened'.

Adverse events reported during the study periodImmediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection

The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.

Face fullness value evaluated by the digital image scoring system after injection and post 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months.Immediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection

The digital image scoring system analyzes the volume change (ml). A higher score means more volume increased in the midface.

VAS pain evaluated immediately and 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injectionImmediate,15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection

The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'.

Serious adverse events reported during the study periodImmediate, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection

The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.

Device failure reported before injectionBefore injection

The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath