Comparing Self-guided Learning (Video and hands-on Simulation) With Traditional Instructor-led Learning for Medical Device Training: a Randomized-controlled Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 224
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Application skills achieved in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test station per participant (yes or no)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study project is to clarify whether defined practical application skills are learned by anesthesiology specialists through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on exercise station ("intervention group"). "Control group" is a traditional instructor-led practical workshop classroom teaching.
Hypothesis: A video-based and self-directed learning program shows no difference in the learning successes than traditional face-to-face workshops.
Detailed Description
The Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine is going to buy and introduce a new generation of anaesthetic machines. Therefore the whole clinical staff of the department who will operate the new anaesthetic machine in the future must be educated and trained with this device before working with patients.
Continuous professional training in the use of medical devices is an essential part of developing professional skills, including in anaesthesia. The professional, routine use of devices is essential to guarantee patient safety. The usual instructor-led workshop-based equipment training in face-to-face lessons is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The high work intensity and shift work in anaesthesia pose a challenge for such training courses. Video-supported learning sequences were more effective than traditional face-to-face lessons, especially for procedural - cognitive processes of complex psychomotor skills. Self-controlled practical practice is more effective than externally controlled practice conditions.
The aim of this study is to clarify whether defined practical application skills (anaesthetic machine) are learned by anesthesiology specialists (nurses and physicians of the department) through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on exercise station ("intervention group"). "Control group" is a traditional instructor-led practical workshop classroom teaching.
• The null hypothesis (H0) is that a video-based and self-directed learning program shows no difference in the learning success than traditional face-to-face workshops
The aim of this study is to clarify whether anesthesiologists and nurses anaesthetists can learn defined practical application skills through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on training station. If this educational research project is able to demonstrate that self-guided learning of complex psychomotor skills needed for the handling of medical devices like respirators is non-inferior to traditional classroom teaching of such skills, this might minimize the dependence on traditional educator-driven resource-intensive workshop teaching and has the potential to change clinical teaching in the future. The educational topic of the study is "device training in the hospital sector".
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- Single (Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Clinical working anaesthesia staff of the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Bern University Hospital
- •written consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •- not fulfilling inclusion criteria
Arms & Interventions
self-guided learning (video and hands-on simulation)
video-based self-directed learning
Intervention: self-guided learning (Other)
traditional instructor-led learning
traditional instructor-led learning in face-to-face workshop
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Application skills achieved in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test station per participant (yes or no)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Achieved or not achieved based on defined practical assignments and oral questioning using a defined catalogue of questions. The testing is carried out by an expert trained as a key user. The test is rated as successful if 60% or more of the questions are answered successfully. The following four criteria are checked: * Working principle * Security aspect * Handling and operation * Theory-practice transfer Each criterion is assessed with 0-3 points 0 = does not apply 1. = rather does not apply 2. = applies 3. = applies very well The final evaluation of the device test is based on the following granulated scale: A - 100% of the criteria (excellent) B 90% - 99% (very good) C 80% - 89% (good) D 70% - 79% (satisfactory) E 60% - 69% (sufficient) F \<60% (unsatisfactory)
Secondary Outcomes
- level of application skills(10 minutes)
- Time spent(1 day)
- cost comparison(1 day)
- open questions after the training(1 day)
- use of resources(1 day)
