JPRN-UMIN000016842Completed未知
Analysis of clinical and pathological features, and endoscopic therapy of nonampullary duodenal adenoma/carcinoma - Analysis of features and endoscopic therapy of duodenal adenoma/carcinoma
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Chiba University
- Enrollment
- 126
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Both UEMR and EMRC had a significantly higher R0 resection rate than EMR. UEMR had significantly lower multiple resection and postbleeding rates than EMR. Only 1 patient (2.1%) who underwent EMRC experienced intraoperative and postoperative perforation. EMR was involved in RX/1 and piecemeal resection. The recurrence rates of EMR, UEMR, and EMRC were 4.3%, 2.0%, and 6.3%, respectively.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- ot applicable to ot applicable (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients evaluated incompetent by doctors in attendance
Investigators
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Neoplastic Barrett Esophagus: Endoscopic Piecemeal vs. En Bloc ResectionBarrett EsophagusBarrett AdenocarcinomaEsophagus NeoplasmNCT03427346Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf407
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Efficacy and Safety of Precut-EMR for Resecting of Colonic PolypColonic PolypsNCT04253990Asan Medical Center
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF EMR VERSUS EMR FOLLOWED BY PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF EARLY BARRETT’S CANCER - p-bec studyhigh grade dysplasia and early carcinoma in Barrett EsophagusEUCTR2008-001183-37-NLErasmus MC
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Prospective randomized comparison of EMR versus EMR followed by photodynamic therapy for the treatment of early barrett's cancer.NL-OMON31690Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam48
Completed
Not Applicable
The Cost Effectiveness of Endoscopic Ultrasound ( EUS ) Based Strategy in Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct StonesCommon Bile Duct CalculiNCT02349568Prince of Songkla University141