MedPath

Primary Sacroiliac Fusion Versus Fusion to the Sacrum for Degenerative Disease of the Lumbar Spine

Not Applicable
Conditions
Degeneration Spine
Interventions
Procedure: S1 screws
Procedure: S2alar-iliac screws
Registration Number
NCT04308018
Lead Sponsor
Technical University of Munich
Brief Summary

To prove that the use of additional S2alar-iliac screws for pure lumbar fusions due to degenerative lumbar disease provides superior outcome compared to the standard procedure of fusion to S1.

Detailed Description

Patients with symptomatic degenerative spine disease with or without spinal stenosis undergoing lumbosacral fusion to S1. Pedicle screws for posterior Instrumentation and fusion of the lumbar spine plus intervertebral fusion L5/S1 (anterior lumbar inter body fusion (ALIF), transforaminal lumbar inter body fusion (TLIF), or posterior lumbar inter body fusion (PLIF)) with

1. Caudal end of the instrumentation at S1

2. Caudal end of the instrumentation at iliac bone via S2alar-iliac screws

Stratification of both groups by:

* Number of instrumented levels

* Sagittal balance (Roussouly type 1+2 vs. 3+4)

Prospective, randomized, controlled, rater-blinded multicentric interventional study with two parallel groups

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
148
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with symptomatic degenerative spine disease with or without spinal stenosis undergoing lumbosacral fusion to S1
  • Lumbar or thoracolumbar Instrumentation
  • Planned ventral intervertebral fusion (ALIF, TLIF, PLIF) in L5/S1
  • Age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • Scoliosis >20°

  • Chronic steroid usage

  • Significant co-morbidity influencing the surgical success:

    • Osteoporosis
    • Rheumatoid arthritis
    • Mental illness/dementia

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
S1S1 screwsCaudal end of the instrumentation at S1
S2alar-iliacS2alar-iliac screwsCaudal end of the instrumentation at iliac bone via S2alar-iliac screws
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Revision rate1 year after surgery

Revisions rates between groups 1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Progressive degeneration of the adjacent segment3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Radiological proof of progressive degeneration of the adjacent segment

Health-related quality of life3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Health-related quality of life evaluated by the "physical component summary (PCS)" of the short-form (SF)-36 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Sacroiliac joint syndrome3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Clinically apparent sacroiliac joint syndrome (Definition: Effective infiltration of local anesthetic) 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Surgery durationSurgery

Surgery duration

Inter-group Oswestry disability index (ODI)3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Difference in Oswestry disability index (ODI) between groups 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

BMRC scale 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Intra-group Oswestry disability index (ODI)3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Difference in ODI 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery versus preoperatively within the same group

Revision rate II24 months after surgery

Revisions rates between groups 24 months after surgery

Intraoperative blood lossIntraoperative

Intraoperative blood loss

Severe adverse events3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

(Severe adverse events) SAE due to instrumentation (new neurological deficit, infection, vascular complications, etc.)

Back pain intensity3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Back pain intensity at the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10; high scores mean a worse outcome) 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Gluteal pain3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Gluteal pain at the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10; high scores mean a worse outcome) 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Changes in sagittal balance1 and 2 years after surgery

Changes in sagittal balance (C7 plumb line, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis) 1 and 2 years after surgery versus preoperatively within the same group

Patient satisfaction3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Patient satisfaction index 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Adverse events3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Adverse events

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath