The Effect of Low Speed Drilling Without Irrigation Versus Conventional Drilling With Irrigation in Extra Short Implants on Primary Stability and Marginal Bone Loss
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Erzincan University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Primary Endpoint
- Evaluation of the status of osseointegration
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Our aim in this study is to compare the effects of low-speed drilling surgery technique without irrigation and conventional implant surgery technique with irrigation on extra short implants. The criteria to be taken into consideration when investigating the effect of these techniques on implants are as follows: evaluation of osseointegration at the end of three months, evaluation of marginal bone loss at the end of three months, initial insertion torque values (maximum insertion torque and final insertion torque), ISQ values obtained with a radiofrequency analyzer (Osstel) at the beginning and at the end of three months.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •There must be toothless space in the maxillary and mandibular posterior region (distal part of the canine in each quadrant).
- •The edentulous space should not require additional bone grafting.
- •Bleeding areas on probing should be less than 10%
- •There should be no pathological periodontal pockets
- •Patients who do not smoke or smoke less than 10 cigarettes
- •There should be no bruxism
- •At least 6 months must have passed since the last tooth extracted from the toothless space where the implant is planned.
- •There should be no diabetes.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Having psychological problems
- •Smoking more than 10 cigarettes
- •Alcohol and drug use
- •Pregnancy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Evaluation of the status of osseointegration
Time Frame: Three months after the implant is placed in the bone. At the end of three months
Fusion of the dental implant with the bone at the microscopic level. Osseointegration will be evaluated as successful or unsuccessful. Successful osseointegration is defined by no mobility in the implant, no radiolucency around the implant on radiography, and no pain in the implant. Otherwise, the osseointegration of the implant is considered unsuccessful.
Marginal bone lose
Time Frame: Three months after the implant is placed in the bone. At the end of three months
It defines the change in the marginal bone level in the neck area of the implant. It is determined by radiographic examination. The initial radiograph is compared with the radiograph at the end of three months. In measurements where the implant platform is the reference point, bone level changes are calculated in mm.
Secondary Outcomes
- Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ Value)(1- Surgical stage where the implant is placed; 2- Three months after the implant is placed in the bone. At the end of three months)
- Insertion Torque value(Surgical stage where the implant is placed)
Investigators
Ömer Faruk Okumuş
Assistant Professor
Erzincan University