Chronic Pelvic Pain Management in Female and Male Adult Patients
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Pelvic Pain Syndrome
- Sponsor
- Salem Anaesthesia Pain Clinic
- Enrollment
- 1000
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain score, objective measurement using the validated Numeric Pain Rating scale
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Pelvic pain is under-reported in healthy adults. Many patients with pelvic pain under-estimate the problem. Chronic pelvic pain can be managed properly, if diagnosed promptly.
This is a quantitative analysis of prospective clinical data. It evaluates the management of pelvic pain in a cohort population, and analyzes the treatment outcome.
Detailed Description
Pelvic pain is common, but under-reported in healthy adults. Pelvic pain is reported more commonly in women than in men. Many patients with pelvic pain under-estimate the severity of the problem. Chronic pelvic pain can be managed successfully, if diagnosed properly. Many combinations of multimodal analgesia and rehabilitation therapy may be safe and effective for pelvic pain. This study is a quantitative analysis of prospective clinical data. It is an evaluation of the prevalence and management of pelvic pain in a cohort population of chronic pain patients. This is an analysis of multimodal analgesia types, rehabilitation therapy types, treatment outcome, and complications.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with chronic pelvic pain
- •Patients with sacroiliac pain
- •Patients with inguinal pain
- •Patients with coccygeal pain
- •Patients with piriformis pain
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with spinal pain
- •Patients who had spine surgery
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain score, objective measurement using the validated Numeric Pain Rating scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain score, using the Numeric Pain Rating scale of 0 to 10, low scores indicate less pain, high scores indicate worse pain