Effect of Breathing Circuits on Intraoperative Body Temperature
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 111
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- trend of changes on body temperature
研究概览
简要总结
To evaluate differences in intraoperative body temperature between heated huimid breathing circuit and conventional breathing circuit
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •aged 18-70 years,
- •ASA I or II
- •patients scheduled for craniotomy under general anesthesia
排除标准
- •ASA III or IV
- •Duration of anesthesia time less than 4 hours
- •emergency operation
研究组 & 干预措施
Group C
non-heated, non-humidified conventional breathing circuit was used in group C patient
干预措施: Group C (Device)
Group E
breathing tube which apply humidity and heat (Evaqua™ Breathing Circuits manufactured by Fischer & Paykel)was used in group E patient
干预措施: Group E (Device)
Group M
Heated humid tube with a warming device (Mega Acer kit manufactured by Acemedical,Seoul Korea)was used in group M patient
干预措施: Group M (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
trend of changes on body temperature
时间窗: from the point of postintubation up to 5 hours
Investigate differences on core body temperature among different kinds of circuit (heated-humid circuit, humid circuit, conventional circuit)
次要结局
- total duration of airwarmer(Bair-Hurgger warming unit) using time(from the point of postintubation up to 5hours)