The HIgh-fidelity Hydraulic couPling Upper-arm Cuff Assessment of Limits, Safety, and Effectiveness (HIPULSE) Trial (Cardiac Output Study)
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- ICUSurgical Patients
- Registration Number
- NCT06895603
- Lead Sponsor
- Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare cardiac output (CO), fluid responsiveness, and related measurements between the Philips AMC and PAC (Swan-Ganz) in ICU or surgical patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
Inclusion Criteria
- Adults aged 18 years and older
- Indication for PAC (Swan-Ganz)
- Indication for radial arterial line
- Subject or legal authorized representative is able to understand and speak the local language (also Spanish is also accepted for US sites) to provide voluntary written informed consent prior to study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
- Emergency surgery
- ICU or surgical positioning where both arms are tucked
- Inability to place the Philips AMC appropriately due to subject anatomy or condition
- Known pregnancy or lactating women (self-report)
- Patients treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump
- Measurements taken in the lateral position
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that clinically interferes with the study endpoints
- Upper arm circumference < 19 cm or > 43 cm
- BMI > 45
- At the PI's discretion, subject does not qualify to participate in the study for any reasons that are not mentioned above
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary Endpoints Approximately 8 months for accrual and follow-up The comparison of cardiac output between the Philips AMC and PAC
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Philips AMC vs Swan-Ganz PAC cardiac output accuracy ICU fluid responsiveness outcomes
Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring Philips AMC effectiveness surgical ICU patient survival
Biomarkers predicting fluid responsiveness Philips AMC Swan-Ganz PAC ICU patient selection
Adverse event comparison Philips AMC Swan-Ganz PAC ICU catheter-related complications management
Non-invasive vs invasive CO monitoring technologies ICU surgical patient hemodynamic stability