Comparison of outcomes following instrumental delivery when episiotmy during delivery is made with visual assessment vs guided aid
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O702- Third degree perineal laceration during delivery
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/03/032129
- Lead Sponsor
- Soundarya
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 328
Inclusion Criteria
-women >= 18 yrs of age with singleton pregnancy attending JIPMER during the study period, delivering by instrumental vaginal delivery
Exclusion Criteria
-previous history of fecal incontinence/prolapse/complete perineal tear
-previous history of perineal surgeries -Receiving episiotomy before crowning of head
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the incidence of OASIs with the use of episiometer and eyeballing and to compare the suture angles achieved with episiometer and eyeballingTimepoint: at baseline-during delivery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare pain/ fecal or flatus incontinence if any in the two groups at 6 weeks and 3 months follow upTimepoint: at 6 weeks and 3 months after delivery