MedPath

Vertical Versus Horizontal Plicataion in Transperienal Repair of Rectocele

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Rectocele
Interventions
Procedure: Vertical plication
Procedure: Horizontal plication
Registration Number
NCT04502953
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

We assumed that the technique of plication of the rectovaginal septum and rectal wall may factor in providing better and more sustained repair that confers more satisfactory improvement in symptoms. The present randomized study aimed to evaluate the outcome of TPR with vertical plication of the rectovaginal septum as compared to the horizontal plication with regards to improvement in ODS, recurrence of rectocele, postoperative complications and dyspareunia.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Vertical plication of the rectovaginal septum was done
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients with ODS caused by conditions other than rectocele such as anismus and internal rectal prolapse
  • patients with slow transit constipation.
  • patients with recurrent rectocele after previous surgery.
  • patients with pre-existing FI
  • patients with associated anorectal pathology.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Vertical plicationVertical plicationVertical plication of the rectovaginal septum was done
Horizontal plicationHorizontal plicationHorizontal plication of the rectovaginal septum was done
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Complete cure of symptoms12 months after repair

Absence of symptoms of constipation with Wexner score \<2

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mansoura university hospital

🇪🇬

Mansourah, Dakahlia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath