Accuracy of Multi-organ Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism
- Interventions
- Other: Ultrasound scan
- Registration Number
- NCT01635257
- Lead Sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
- Brief Summary
Patients with suspected Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and a high clinical probability or a high D-dimer level should undergo a second level diagnostic test such as Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (MCTPA). Unfortunately MCTPA involves radiation exposure, is expensive, is not feasible in unstable patients and has contraindications. UltraSound (US) is safe and rapidly available even in unstable patients. Many authors evaluated the diagnostic role of Compression Ultrasound Scan (CUS) for detecting limbs Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), TransThoracic Echocardiography (TTE) for detecting Right Ventricular Dysfunction (RVD) or Thoracic UltraSound (TUS) for detecting subpleural infarcts in patients with suspected PE. No previous studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CUS, TTE and TUS combined (multiorgan US) for the diagnosis of PE. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan US.
Methods. Consecutive patients that underwent MCTPA in the Emergency Department for clinical suspicion of PE and with a simplified Well's score\>4 (PE likely) or with a D-dimer value ≥500ng/ml were enrolled in the study. MCTPA was considered the gold standard for PE diagnosis. A multiorgan US was performed by an emergency physician sonographer before MCTPA. PE was considered echographically present if CUS was positive for DVT or TTE was positive for RVD or at least one pulmonary subpleural infarct was detected with TUS. The accuracy of the single and multiorgan US was calculated.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 357
- Patients with clinical suspected pulmonary embolism
- Simplified Well's score>4 (PE likely) or D-dimer value ≥500ng/ml
- Patients that undergo MCTPA in the Emergency Department for suspected pulmonary embolism
- Refused consent
- Less than 18 years old
- Not possible to perform ultrasound scan within 3 hours before MCTPA
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description suspected pulmonary embolism patients Ultrasound scan patients with clinical suspicion of PE and with a simplified Well's score\>4 (PE likely) or with a D-dimer value ≥500ng/ml presenting to the emergency departments of Careggi University Hospital (Firenze), of San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital (Torino) of Ospedale Pierantoni-Morgagni (Forlì)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism The goldstandard for PE diagnosis is the MCTPA performed within 24 hours from ED presentation. The recruiting period is 5 months. There is not a follow-up for the included patients. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, negative and positive likelihood ratio of limb, cardiac, thoracic and multi-organ ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department considering as gold standard the Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (MCTPA)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Emergency Department Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
🇮🇹Firenze, Tuscany, Italy
Department of Emergency Medicine, Pierantoni Morgagni Hospital
🇮🇹Forlì, Italy
Department of Emergency Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital
🇮🇹Torino, Italy