Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02165761
NCT02165761TerminatedNot Applicable

Evaluation of Anti-platelet Factor 4/Heparin Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Implanted With the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft Versus Non-heparin Bonded Synthetic Vascular Grafts.

W.L.Gore & Associates4 sites in 1 country42 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Sponsor
Enrollment
42
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Number of Participants With a Prevalence of a Positive Poly-specific Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) at Day 7 and/or Day 14 Time Points

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To characterize the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft as compared to non-heparin bonded synthetic vascular grafts in terms of the prevalence and persistence of anti-platelet factor 4 / heparin antibodies (anti-PF4 / H antibodies).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •The patient is not a candidate for a native fistula.
  • •The patient requires the creation of an upper arm vascular access graft for hemodialysis secondary to a diagnosis of End-Stage Renal Disease.
  • •The patient has been on hemodialysis for ≥1 month.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •The patient is scheduled for a different surgical procedure within 30 days post Index Procedure.
  • •The patient has a known hypercoagulable disorder or bleeding disorder.
  • •The patient has had a previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II (HIT type II) or has known sensitivity to heparin.

Arms & Interventions

GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft

Active Comparator

GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft

Intervention: GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft (Device)

Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft

Other

Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft

Intervention: Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of Participants With a Prevalence of a Positive Poly-specific Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) at Day 7 and/or Day 14 Time Points

Time Frame: 14 days after index procedure

Antibody screening was performed using a commercial poly-specific EIA that detects antibodies of any of the IgG, IgA, and / or IgM classes against PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate complexes, the EIA-GAM.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
W.L.Gore & Associates
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials