COMPARISON OF MICRODERMABRASION FOLLOWED BY 30 % TCA VS MICRODERMABRASION FOLLOWED BY PRF IN TREATMENT OF STRETCH MARKS
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: L906- Striae atrophicae
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/08/035539
- Lead Sponsor
- MGM Medical College Aurangabad
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1) Age >18 years
2) Patients having Striae Distensae
Exclusion Criteria
1) Patients having unrealistic expectations
2) Patients not willing to undergo treatment and proper follow up.
3) Patients having history of treatment taken for the same
4) Patients not agreeing to sign consent to be included in study.
5)Patients with thrombocytopenia (low platelet count, Hypofibrinogenaemia ,other bleeding disorders)
6)Patients with autoimmune diseases, connective tissue disorders, genetic diseases.
7)Patients with critical systemic illnesses like CLD,CKD etc.
8)Patients on analgesic agents(eg. NSAIDS ) and on Anti-coagulation
therapy (eg. warfarin, dabigatran, heparin),antiplatelet therapy.
9)Pregnant women.
10) Lactating mothers
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The efficacy and safety of microdermabrasion with 30 % TCA will be compared with that of microdermabrasion with PRF in treatment of striae distensae .Timepoint: 5 time points each 4 weeks apart i.e. baseline, 4 weeks,8 weeks,12 weeks, 16 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study any complications if any occurs during the procedure of Microdermabrasion f/b TCA and during the procedure of Microdermabrasion f/b PRF. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 5 time points each 4 weeks apart i.e. baseline, 4 weeks,8 weeks,12 weeks,16 weeks