Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06562972
NCT06562972CompletedNot Applicable

3D Quantification Assessment of Mandibular Bone Resorption Using STL Registration-Based Superimposition Following Removable Complete Denture Occlusal Equilibration

Badr University1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: August 18, 2024Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
3D Quantification Assessment of Mandibular Bone Resorption

Study Overview

Brief Summary

STL registration-based superimposition is an advanced technique for assessing mandibular bone resorption in removable complete denture (RCD) patients. This 3D method involves aligning and comparing digital models of the mandible before and after RCD use, offering high accuracy and comprehensive analysis. The process includes 3D scanning, STL conversion, registration, superimposition, and quantification. Occlusal equilibration of RCDs plays a crucial role in distributing masticatory forces and influencing bone resorption patterns. Studies using this technique have revealed non-uniform resorption, with variations in different regions of the mandible. While offering numerous advantages over traditional methods, challenges include potential registration errors and the need for specialized equipment and expertise. Future developments may incorporate machine learning, biomechanical modeling, and long-term studies to enhance understanding and clinical application of this technology in prosthodontics and oral surgery.

Detailed Description

STL registration-based superimposition is an innovative technique for evaluating mandibular bone resorption in patients using removable complete dentures (RCDs). This 3D method aligns and compares digital mandible models from different time points, providing precise volumetric and surface change measurements. The process involves 3D scanning, STL file conversion, model registration, superimposition, and quantification.

Occlusal equilibration of RCDs is crucial for distributing masticatory forces evenly, influencing bone resorption patterns. Research using this technique has shown that mandibular bone resorption is non-uniform, with variations across different mandibular regions.

While offering superior accuracy and comprehensive analysis compared to traditional methods, this approach faces challenges such as potential registration errors and the need for specialized equipment and expertise. Future developments may incorporate machine learning, biomechanical modeling, and longitudinal studies to enhance understanding and clinical application in prosthodontics and oral surgery.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
45 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Completely edentulous patients ranging from age 45 to 75 years
  • Angle's Class I skeletal relationship
  • Normal facial symmetry
  • Cooperative patients
  • Adequate inter-arch space not less than 12mm

Exclusion Criteria

  • Temporomandibular disorders
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy
  • Flabby tissues or sharp mandibular residual ridge.
  • Heavy smokers.
  • Patient's with neuromuscular disorders
  • Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Angle's class II and III skeletal relationship

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

3D Quantification Assessment of Mandibular Bone Resorption

Time Frame: Baseline, thee months, six months and twelve months

3D quantification assessment of mandibular bone resorption uses advanced imaging techniques like Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and digital 3D software to measure and analyze bone loss in the lower jaw. This process is essential for accurate diagnosis, treatment planning (e.g., implants), and monitoring bone changes over time. It provides precise measurements, visual representations, and comprehensive analysis of bone density and volume, aiding in better clinical outcomes. Despite its advantages, it can be costly and involves radiation exposure, making it less accessible in some practices.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Patient Satisfaction(Baseline, thee months, six months and twelve months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Badr University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Shady El Naggar

Associate Professor

Badr University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials