Comparison of two methods of penile and ring blocks for pediatric circumcision

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Forty pediatric patients less than 10 years of age and ASA physical status 1 posted for circumcision

• Registration Number: CTRI/2017/11/010548
• Lead Sponsor: Surya Children Hospital

Brief Summary

Inclusion, exclusion criteria and enrollment will be done as mentioned. One half of patients will recieve dorsal penile block and ring infiltration while the rest will be given ring infiltration alone. Comparison will be made among the two groups on the basis of age, weight and incidence of block failure (i.e. rise in heart rate of more than 20%from baseline on surgical stimulus), primary outcome being analgesia and secondary outcome being complications. Appropriate test will be used for statistical analysis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2017-01-12
• Last Update Posted: 2017-11-17

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: Male
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

Forty paediatric patients less than 10 years of age and ASA physical status 1 posted for circumcision.

Exclusion Criteria

patients without consent, known allergy to local anaesthetic, known coagulopathy.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Analgesia	Surgical stimulation. Heart rate changes due to surgical incision will assess the analgesia rendered by the block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
complications	Complications noted during and after the regional block within 24 hours

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Surya Childrens Hospital; 🇮🇳 (Suburban), MAHARASHTRA, India

Surya Childrens Hospital

🇮🇳(Suburban), MAHARASHTRA, India

Dr Vrushali C Ponde

Principal investigator

9819886502

vrushaliponde@yahoo.co.in