MedPath

Study of a 4-phasic Oral Contraceptive for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Metrorrhagia
Interventions
Drug: EV/DNG (Qlaira, Natazia, BAY86-5027)
Drug: placebo
Registration Number
NCT01638923
Lead Sponsor
Bayer
Brief Summary

To evaluate efficacy and safety of a combined oral contraceptive of estradiol valerate and dienogest in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
339
Inclusion Criteria
  • Women 18 years or older in generally good health with a diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding without organic pathology, requesting contraception
  • Willingness to use barrier contraception (e.g., condoms) from screening to study completion
  • Willingness to use and collect sanitary protection (pads and tampons) provided by the sponsor and compatible with the alkaline hematin test throughout study completion
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Current diagnosis of organic uterine bleeding
  • History of endometrial ablation, or dilatation and curettage within 2 months of Visit 1.
  • Clinically significant pelvic findings (whether or not confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound [TVU]).
  • Clinically significant abnormal results of breast examination (breast palpation).
  • Positive pregnancy test at Visit 1
  • Less than three months since delivery, abortion, or lactation before to start Visit 1
  • Other contraceptive methods
  • Any disease or condition that may worsen under hormonal treatment
  • Smokers over the age of 35
  • Body mass index >32
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 1EV/DNG (Qlaira, Natazia, BAY86-5027)-
Arm 2placebo-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Absolute change in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) at baseline and 90 days90 day baseline period and 90 days during treatment period
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of subjects with successful treatment90 days during treatment phase

Successful treatment is defined as no bleeding episode with MBL of 80 mL or more and a decrease to a value \</=50% of MBL compared to 90 day run-in period

Absolute change of average MBL at baseline and up to cycle 7 (one cycle = 28 days)Baseline and cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, cycle 4, cycle 5, cycle 6, cycle 7
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerabilityUp to 12 months
Percent change of MBL at baseline and 90 day period during treatment phaseBaseline and 90 days during treatment phase
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 84Treatment day 84

Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.

Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 196Treatment day 196

Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.

Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 84Treatment day 84

Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.

Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 196Treatment day 196

Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath