Study of a 4-phasic Oral Contraceptive for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- Conditions
- Metrorrhagia
- Interventions
- Drug: EV/DNG (Qlaira, Natazia, BAY86-5027)Drug: placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT01638923
- Lead Sponsor
- Bayer
- Brief Summary
To evaluate efficacy and safety of a combined oral contraceptive of estradiol valerate and dienogest in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 339
- Women 18 years or older in generally good health with a diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding without organic pathology, requesting contraception
- Willingness to use barrier contraception (e.g., condoms) from screening to study completion
- Willingness to use and collect sanitary protection (pads and tampons) provided by the sponsor and compatible with the alkaline hematin test throughout study completion
- Current diagnosis of organic uterine bleeding
- History of endometrial ablation, or dilatation and curettage within 2 months of Visit 1.
- Clinically significant pelvic findings (whether or not confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound [TVU]).
- Clinically significant abnormal results of breast examination (breast palpation).
- Positive pregnancy test at Visit 1
- Less than three months since delivery, abortion, or lactation before to start Visit 1
- Other contraceptive methods
- Any disease or condition that may worsen under hormonal treatment
- Smokers over the age of 35
- Body mass index >32
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm 1 EV/DNG (Qlaira, Natazia, BAY86-5027) - Arm 2 placebo -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Absolute change in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) at baseline and 90 days 90 day baseline period and 90 days during treatment period
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of subjects with successful treatment 90 days during treatment phase Successful treatment is defined as no bleeding episode with MBL of 80 mL or more and a decrease to a value \</=50% of MBL compared to 90 day run-in period
Absolute change of average MBL at baseline and up to cycle 7 (one cycle = 28 days) Baseline and cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, cycle 4, cycle 5, cycle 6, cycle 7 Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability Up to 12 months Percent change of MBL at baseline and 90 day period during treatment phase Baseline and 90 days during treatment phase Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 84 Treatment day 84 Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 196 Treatment day 196 Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 84 Treatment day 84 Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 196 Treatment day 196 Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.