"Get Fruved:" A Peer-led, Train-the-trainer Social Marketing Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Prevent Childhood Obesity.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 5,800
- Locations
- 7
- Primary Endpoint
- Body weight
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This program is a non-diet approach to obesity prevention for older adolescents which does not promote following a special diet to manage weight; it promotes healthy behavior associated with obesity prevention. This approach is important with youth and older adolescent populations to avoid impairment in emotional well-being associated with body dissatisfaction. Healthy weight status will be achieved by improving dietary intake patterns, increasing physical activity, and improving stress management. Fall of year 01 was devoted to the recruitment of student partners (intense intervention group) and the development of partnerships. In the spring of year 01, recruited students were enrolled in two newly developed undergraduate courses across four intervention state partners, became collegiate 4-H members, planned a social marketing campaign, and/or learned to be peer mentors or student researchers. In year 02, first year college students were recruited, peer mentors were matched with a group of first year students, and the developed social marketing campaign was pilot tested on four college campuses (diffuse intervention) by the collegiate 4-H teams. In year 02, a toolkit with 24 weeks of intervention activities was also refined. In year 03, the collegiate 4-H team (intense intervention group) used the refined toolkit to test and implement the intervention on college campuses. In year 03, the assessment process for high school 4-H students (intense intervention group) will be pilot tested and college students will work with the high school students on adapting the toolkit for use in the implementation of the social marketing campaign in high school settings in year 04 (diffuse intervention). ). In year 04, the pilot and feasibility tested college intervention was tested with a randomized control trial design with 30 intervention and 29 control university partners. The adapted high school toolkit was pilot and feasibility tested in three intervention and two control high school settings. In year 05, the high school intervention was tested with a randomized control trial design with 9 intervention and 7 control high schools in one district's high schools. On all measures it is anticipated that participants in the intensive intervention group will have greater improvements than those in the diffuse intervention group and both intensive and diffuse intervention groups will have improvements over those in the control groups.
Detailed Description
The goal of the research is to develop a novel strategy to promote healthy behaviors associated with obesity prevention in older adolescent populations. A community based participatory research (CBPR) approach is used with partnerships among older adolescents, university researchers and faculty, and Extension partners. The objective is to test the effectiveness of a peer-led, train-the-trainer intervention. The intervention is an interactive, non-traditional social marketing, online media, and environmental change approach seeking to promote healthy behavior with communities of college and high school students. Specific health behaviors targeted include increasing intakes of fruits and vegetables, decreasing foods high in saturated fats and added sugars, managing stress, and increasing physical activity. This project uniquely 1) increases participant engagement through creative interactions, participant-created content, and incorporation of age-appropriate technology; 2) incorporates social environments and peer-led strategies; and 3) simultaneously addresses changes in environments to support participant-driven behavior change efforts.
This project is a Pretest-Posttest, Control Group Trial using a nested cohort design with three conditions (intense intervention, diffuse intervention, and control), four control universities and four intervention universities in years 01- 03, one high school as control and one as intervention at each of the four intervention university towns in years 03-04, and disseminated to four additional university and high school pairs in years 04-05.
A CBPR, peer-led approach is used in that upper level college students mentor freshmen 4-H college students through the development of the intervention. The CBPR, peer-led approach continues when the now sophomore 4-H college students implement the intervention with incoming college freshmen in the following year. The train-the-trainer approach is utilized when the now junior level 4-H college students mentor 4-H high school students in the modification of the intervention for high schools. The approach continues when 4-H high school students implement the intervention with incoming freshmen in high schools.
In the fall of year 01, 283 freshman students were recruited from general/survey nutrition courses at the four intervention universities to participate in a special undergraduate spring course (the intense intervention group). 94 freshman students were also recruited from general/survey nutrition courses at the four control universities. During the fall, researchers at the intervention schools worked with nutrition (graduate and undergraduate) students to identify and develop partnerships with student organizations for the development of a social marketing health promotion campaign. Researchers and student partners also worked with local high schools (including student organizations, school food service, Parent Teacher Associations, school wellness committees, and administration) and school boards to formalize research agreements and relationships.
In the spring of year 01, as a part of the newly developed undergraduate course, the freshman students (the intense intervention group) from each intervention university joined their collegiate 4-H program. The courses were offered as independent studies or as a newly developed course through the respective University's PI. The course covered principals of social marketing for health behavior change. University researchers and Extension faculty collaborated and taught in-person classes with their respective collegiate 4-H students. Collegiate 4-H students were co-taught (by all four University's research and Extension faculty) and had the opportunity to interact with the other collegiate 4-H students from all four intervention universities through web-based technologies. Throughout the course, the collegiate 4-H students developed and planned a social marketing campaign. Following a peer-led approach, the 4-H students partnered with and were mentored by upper-level nutrition students and student organizations (student partners) in the development and planning of the campaign.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Factorial
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- — to 24 Years (Child, Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Students in the intensive intervention group must be registered for a general/survey nutrition or wellness course
- •Students in the diffuse intervention group randomly selected from those who screen in because they are at increased health risk (increased BMI and waist circumference, low intakes of fruits and vegetables, high levels of stress, and low levels of physical activity)
Exclusion Criteria
- •There are no exclusionary criteria for students in the intensive intervention group
- •Students who are not at-risk for health issues are excluded from the diffuse intervention group
Arms & Interventions
Intensive intervention group
The intensive intervention group participates in development and implementation of the social marketing and health promotion campaign and peer-led campus activities and is assessed for their health-related behaviors. This was Wave 1 in colleges in Yr 01-02 and is being repeated as Wave 2 in colleges in Yr 03. This will also be repeated in high schools in Yr 04.
Intervention: Social marketing and health promotion campaign (Behavioral)
Diffuse intervention group
The diffuse intervention group receives the social marketing and health promotion campaign and participates in the peer-led campus activities and is assessed for their health related behaviors, but is not involved in the design and delivery of the intervention materials and activities. This was Wave 1 in colleges in Yr 01-02 and is being repeated as Wave 2 in colleges in Yr 03. This will also be repeated in high schools in Yr 04.
Intervention: Social marketing and health promotion campaign (Behavioral)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Body weight
Time Frame: Change in body weight from baseline to six months and one year follow up
Following an overnight fast and voiding, weight is measured in light clothing without shoes and with pockets emptied. Weight is measured in duplicate (average used unless \> 0.1 kg difference requiring re-measurement until 2 values within range are achieved) to the nearest 0.1 kilograms using a calibrated electronic scale by trained assessors. Height without shoes is measured to the nearest 0.1 centimeter using a portable stadiometer. Height and weight are used to calculate BMI.
Secondary Outcomes
- Dietary quality(Change in dietary quality from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Amount of physical activity(Change in amount of physical activity from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Behavior changeability(Change in perceptions and willingness to change from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Sleep(Change in sleep from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Campus healthy food access(Change in campus food choice from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Environmental change(Change in the campus environment from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Recreational facility usage(Change in recreational facility usage from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Fruit and vegetable intake(Change in fruit and vegetable intake from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Body composition(Change in body composition from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Eating competence(Change in eating competence from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
- Stress(Change in stress from baseline to six months and one year follow up)
Investigators
Sarah Colby
Associate Professor
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
