Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07256821
NCT07256821RecruitingNot Applicable

A Prospective, Mixed Methods, Observational Study to Define a Diaphragm-focussed and Patient-acceptable Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) Load in Difficult to Wean, Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: November 23, 2025Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Diaphragmatic muscle activation (measured by electromyography)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

200,000 adults are admitted to intensive care in the UK each year. Many of these patients need help with their breathing and are put on a machine called a ventilator.

Research shows that many patients using a ventilator quickly develop weakness in their main breathing muscle, called the diaphragm. This weakness can cause a longer time on the ventilator, a longer hospital stay, and higher chances of health problems or death.

Inspiratory muscle training is a breathing exercise where the patient breathes against resistance through a small device (like breathing through a straw). It aims to improve the strength of the diaphragm and reduce how long patients are on the ventilator.

Why is this research needed?

Research shows that current breathing exercise programmes do not help patients come off the ventilator or go home quicker. This may be because these breathing exercises strengthen the wrong muscles (those in the chest and neck, that are not efficient). These exercises can also be distressing for patients.

What will be done in this research? This research aims to develop a breathing exercise programme that focusses on strengthening the diaphragm. We will also make sure patients do not find the breathing exercise too distressing.

This research will measure how the breathing muscles respond to four different levels of breathing exercise and ask patients to feedback on each level.

  1. At each breathing exercise level, the effort of the breathing muscles will be measured using a small tube inserted into the nostril and small sticky patches on the chest and neck. We aim to find the level where the diaphragm is being pushed to work hard but other muscles in the chest and neck are not.
  2. After each breathing exercise level patients will be asked how they found it - for example, easy, pleasant, scary.

This procedure will be repeated 1-3 times over seven days with at least 24 hours between each measurement

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Mechanically ventilated patients with a tracheostomy
  • •Aged ≥ 18 years
  • •Co-operative and able to participate in IMT.
  • •Informed consent or surrogate approval

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Facial or skull fracture, or a bleeding disorder which would prohibit oesophageal catheter placement.
  • •Undrained pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum.
  • •Delirium or deep sedation that impedes the patient's ability to participate in study procedures
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Unlikely to survive, or consultant assessment that the patient is not appropriate.
  • •Wounds that prohibit EMG electrode placement.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Diaphragmatic muscle activation (measured by electromyography)

Time Frame: Up to 7 days

At rest and at each IMT load on each study occasion

Extra diaphragmatic muscle activity (surface electromyography of scalene, sternocleidomastoid and parasternal muscles)

Time Frame: Up to 7 days

At rest and at each IMT load on each study occasion

Perceived difficultly and unpleasantness (number rating scale 0-10)

Time Frame: Up to 7 days

At each IMT load on each study occasion

The experience of IMT using qualitative techniques including verbal and non-verbal (including written communication, picture and word boards)

Time Frame: Up to 7 days

At each IMT load on each study occasion

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials