MedPath

Mechanisms of Neurodynamic Treatments

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Diffusion MRI
Physiotherapy
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Neurodynamic Treatment
Mechanistic Trial
Nerve Mobilisation
Interventions
Other: Advice
Other: Neurodynamic exercises
Drug: Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)
Registration Number
NCT05859412
Lead Sponsor
University of Oxford
Brief Summary

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a relatively common condition caused by compression of one of the main nerves at the wrist, the median nerve. Non-surgical treatments, like steroid injections and physiotherapy, are the first line of treatment for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The investigators have previously shown that specific physiotherapeutic exercises (neurodynamic exercises) can reduce the need for carpal tunnel surgery in some patients. Experimental studies in animal models demonstrate that these exercises have an anti-inflammatory effect and can help the nerve to regenerate. However, the exact mechanisms of action of these exercises are not well understood in patients. A better understanding of the mechanisms of action of physiotherapeutic exercises would help clinicians to better target these treatments to those patients who may benefit from them.

AIM: To investigate the mechanisms of action of 6 weeks' neurodynamic treatments on nerve function and structure as well as patient-reported outcome measures in patients with CTS compared to a positive control intervention (routine care steroid injection) and a negative control intervention (advice).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-blind randomised mechanistic trial, patients with confirmed mild to moderate CTS (n=78) and age and gender-matched healthy controls (n=30) will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to a 6-week neurodynamic exercise group, steroid injection, or advice group. Outcome measures will be explored at baseline (patients and controls), post-intervention (patients), and 6-month follow-up (patients). Outcomes include diffusion-weighted and anatomical MRI of the median nerve at the wrist, quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction studies, inflammatory markers in blood and skin biopsies, and validated questionnaires for pain, function, and psychological factors. Two-way repeated measures ANCOVAs (factors time and intervention, adjusted for baseline measurements as a continuous covariate) will be performed to identify differences in MRI parameters, clinical assessment, and inflammatory markers between patients in different groups and healthy controls.

Detailed Description

Follow-up at 6 months will only include outcome measures from questionnaires.

Details on enrollment:

Pilot testing of healthy participants who consented to our ethics but will not be included in the study was on 13-April-2023.

* First healthy participant enrolled: 17-May-2023.

* First patient participant enrolled: 1-June-2023.

Details on amendment:

* Amendment SA2_BPOR on 3/Aug/2023 to expand recruitment through registries of patients

* Amendment SA3_REC on 22/Aug/2023 to add Thames Valley Primary Care Research Partnership, musculoskeletal clinics, and media advertisement to help with recruitment of participants.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
108
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AdviceAdviceThe advice group will receive advice but no additional intervention during the 6 week intervention period (negative control group)
Neurodynamic exercisesNeurodynamic exercises6-weeks home exercise programme of nerve and tendon gliding exercises
Steroid injection Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)Single steroid injection into Carpal Tunnel (positive control group)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Median nerve fractional anisotropy as determined on diffusion weighted imagingBaseline

Fractional anisotropy will be extracted from regions-of-interest in the median nerve and compared to healthy control group

Change in median nerve fractional anisotropy as determined on diffusion weighted imagingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Change in fractional anisotropy extracted from regions-of-interest in the median nerve at post-intervention (after 6-weeks) compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in nerve markers on anatomical MRIFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. ratio/mm2; continuous data

Nerve markers on diffusion weighted imaging: water diffusivity (mm2/s)Baseline

Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. mm2/s; continuous data

Exercise adherence to the neurodynamic home-based intervention - number of sessionsFrom start of intervention until end of intervention (6 weeks)

Patient self-reported number of sessions per day throughout the intervention in an exercise diary

Change in thermal detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold detection threshold; thermal sensory limenFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Thermal detection thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger).

Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is detected)

Wind-up ratio as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Wind-up ration will be assessed using a pin prick (mN) over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Ratio, continous data

Vibration detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Vibration detection thresholds will be assessed using a tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale) over a bony prominence over (e.g., palmar side of the distal end of the second metacarpal)

Change in vibration detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Change in vibration detection thresholds will be assessed using a tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale) over a bony prominence over (e.g., palmar side of the distal end of the second metacarpal)

Nerve markers on anatomical MRIBaseline

Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. ratio/mm2; continuous data

Changes in median nerve MRI T2 mappingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

ms; continuous data

Thermal pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold painful thresholdBaseline

Pain thermal thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger) and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).

Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is initially detected as painful)

Median nerve MRI magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)Baseline

ratio; continuous data

Change to nerve markers on diffusion weighted imaging: water diffusivity (mm2/s)From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. mm2/s; continuous data

Median nerve MRI T2 mappingBaseline

ms; continuous data

Changes in median nerve MRI magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

ratio; continuous data

Changes in median nerve conduction velocities from electrodiagnostic studies (m/s)From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

m/s; continuous data

Changes in median sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs): amplitudes (mV)From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

mV; continuous data

Thermal detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing - warm and cold detection threshold; thermal sensory limenBaseline

Thermal detection thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger).

Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is detected)

Mechanical pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Mechanical pain thresholds will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN). They will be assessed over the index finger and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).

Change in mechanical pain sensitivity as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Mechanical pain sensitivity will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN) over the index finger. Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean of all numerical ratings for pinprick stimuli will be calculated

Pinch strength test - maximum isometric strengthBaseline

Pinch grip dynamometry. Continuous data, kg

Change in nerve mechanosensitivity - positive upper limb neurodynamic testsFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Upper limb neurodynamic tests will be assessed to determine the presence of increased mechanosensitivity. The neurodynamic test will be graded as 'positive', when there is at least partial reproduction of symptoms and when symptoms can be modified with structural differentiation. Otherwise, the neurodynamic test will be graded as 'negative'

Symptom severity and limitations in hand function as assessed by the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaireBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Patient reported symptoms and limitations on the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire

Location of symptoms in a body and a hand diagramBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks)

Patient reported location of symptoms in a body diagram and a hand diagram.

Functional deficits- Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaireBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on ability to perform activities as per quick DASH questionnaire

Presence of neuropathic pain - pain DETECTBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Patient screened for neuropathic pain using pain DETECT

Presence of psychological co-morbidities - The Depression, Anxiety, and Positive Outlook Scale (DAPOS)Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per DAPOS

Assessment of sleep interference - Insomnia Severity IndexBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on sleep interference with the Insomnia Severity Index.

Change in mechanical detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Mechanical detection thresholds will be assessed using a standardised set of von Frey filaments (mN) over the index finger. Geometric mean wil be calculated

Change in pressure pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Change in pressure pain thresholds will be assessed using an algometer (kg) on the thenar eminence and over the contralateral lower limb (tibialis anterior)

Adverse and serious adverse eventsFrom start of intervention until end of intervention (6 weeks)

Patient self-reported adverse events

Mechanical detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Mechanical detection thresholds will be assessed using a standardised set of von Frey filaments (mN) over the index finger. Geometric mean will be calculated

Change in mechanical pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Mechanical pain thresholds will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN). They will be assessed over the index finger and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).

Mechanical pain sensitivity as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Mechanical pain sensitivity will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN) over the index finger. Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean of all numerical ratings for pinprick stimuli will be calculated

Dynamic mechanical allodynia as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean (compound measure) of all numerical ratings across light touch stimulators over the index finger

Change in wind-up ratio as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Change in wind-up ration will be assessed using a pin prick (mN) over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Ratio, continuous data

Pressure pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingBaseline

Pressure pain thresholds will be assessed using an algometer (kg) on the thenar eminence and over the contralateral lower limb (tibialis anterior)

Change in pinch strength test - maximum isometric strengthFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Pinch grip dynamometry. Continuous data, kg

Neuropathic pain symptoms - Neuropathic Pain Symptom InventoryBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Patient reported outcomes on neuropathic pain symptoms as assessed on Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory.

Change in thermal pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold painful thresholdFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Pain thermal thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger) and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).

Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is initially detected as painful)

Change in dynamic mechanical allodynia as assessed in Quantitative sensory testingFrom baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean (compound measure) of all numerical ratings across light touch stimulators over the index finger

Nerve mechanosensitivity- upper limb neurodynamic test (median nerve)Baseline

Evaluation of nerve mechanosensitivity in response to mechanical load (increased tension) applied to the nerve. Range of elbow extension at point of symptoms (degrees)

Change in nerve mechanosensitivity- upper limb neurodynamic test (median nerve)From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

Change in nerve mechanosensitivity in response to mechanical load (increased tension) applied to the nerve. Range of elbow extension at point of symptoms (degrees)

Nerve mechanosensitivity - positive upper limb neurodynamic testsBaseline

Upper limb neurodynamic tests will be assessed to determine the presence of increased mechanosensitivity. The neurodynamic test will be graded as 'positive', when there is at least partial reproduction of symptoms plus when symptoms can be modified with structural differentiation. Otherwise, the neurodynamic test will be graded as 'negative'

Presence of central sensitisation as assessed with the Central Sensitisation InventoryBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Patient reported central sensitisation on the Central Sensitisation Inventory

Functional deficits- Patient specific functional scale (PSFS)Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on the patient specific functional scale

Presence of psychological co-morbidities - pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per pain catastrophising scale (PCS)

Assessment of quality of life - EQ-5D-5LBaseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on quality of life as per EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

Symptom intensity levels on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Patient reported average intensity of pain, paraesthesia and numbness on 10cm visual analogue scales, ranging from no symptoms to worst symptoms ever

Presence of neuropathic pain - DN4Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Patient screened for neuropathic pain using DN4

Presence of psychological co-morbidities - short-form Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up

Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per short-form Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford

🇬🇧

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath