MedPath

Misoprostol for Secondary Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage at the Community Level in India

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01462422
Lead Sponsor
Gynuity Health Projects
Brief Summary

This study compares two community-level strategies: selective administration of 800 mcg sublingual misoprostol to women at 350 mL blood loss for secondary prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) with universal use of 600 mcg oral misoprostol at the time of delivery for primary prevention of PPH. The study hypothesizes that at community-level births, secondary prevention for women is non-inferior (based on clinical parameters) to universal prophylaxis provided to women for primary prevention of PPH. This cluster-design non-inferiority trial has the potential to inform service delivery programs on clinical outcomes, program feasibility, cost and acceptability of two different community models of PPH care using misoprostol.

Detailed Description

Rationale for Research: There is an absence of concrete data on the programmatic and cost-effectiveness of different service delivery models for prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage with misoprostol, prompting a discussion of whether resources are best spent on misoprostol for primary prevention at lower levels (with treatment carried out at higher levels via referral) or whether immediate proactive treatment strategies should be considered. As the training and policy implications of universal prevention versus selective treatment approaches vary, simple and effective service delivery models are urgently needed to help governments and organizations decide how to best focus their limited resources. This study proposes to study the efficacy of a hybrid strategy (i.e., secondary prevention) that combines elements of prevention and treatment. Results of this study could provide a new model of care that will medicate fewer women, save costs and address the clinical conundrum of guessing at the safety of administering a prevention dose of misoprostol followed quickly by a larger treatment dose.

Study design: This randomized cluster trial will recruit women with deliveries attended by auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) that occur at homes or at health sub-centers. ANMs will be randomized to administer the intervention as described in the primary or secondary prevention arm.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
3032
Inclusion Criteria
  1. delivering at home or sub-center with an auxilliary nurse midwife (ANM)
  2. able and willing to provide informed consent
  3. meeting Ministry of Health Guidelines for home or sub-center delivery
Exclusion Criteria
  1. high-risk pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Secondary PreventionMisoprostol-
Primary preventionMisoprostol-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of women with post-delivery hemoglobin ≤ 7.8 gm/dL72 hours (plus or minus 8 hours) after delivery

A 20% rate of post delivery Hb ≤7.8 gm/dL in the study arm with women receiving selective administration of 800 mcg sublingual misoprostol is non-inferior to a 13% rate of post delivery Hb ≤ 7.8 gm/dL in the study arm with women receiving universal 600 mcg oral misoprostol prophylaxis.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of transfer to referral facilities for PPHwithin 72 hours (plus or minus 8 hours) after delivery

Proportion of women who are transferred from the location of delivery to higher level of care because the birth attendent diagnosed or suspected PPH.

Rate of PPHwithin 1 hour after delivery

Proportion of women with 500 mL-999 mL blood loss following delivery, as measured by a calibrated blood collection drape.

Rate of severe PPHwithin 1 hour after delivery

Proportion of women with \> 1000 mL blood loss following delivery, as measured by a calibrated blood collection drape.

Rate of adverse eventsWithin 72 hours (plus or minus 8 hours) after delivery

Adverse events include prolonged hospitalization, permanent or serious disability, additional threat to life, or death.

Mean blood loss1 hour after delivery

Blood loss will be measured using a blood collection drape, calibrated at 50 mL intervals.

Rate of additional interventions needed to control bleedingwithin 72 hours (plus or minus 8 hours) after delivery

Addtional interventions include administration of other uterotonics (e.g., oxytocin), IV fluids, comprehensive emergency obstetric care, blood transfusion and surgery

Cost-effectiveness72 hours (plus or minus 8 hours) after delivery

The cost-effectiveness of the two interventions will be compared. The cost-effectiveness measure will utilize information collected on cost of the study drug, materials used to control bleeding, and the cost of transfer and subsequent care received by women who are in in need of higher level care.

Proportion of women reporting known side effects of misoprostol1 hour after delivery

Recognized side-effects of misoprostol include: Shivering, fever, headache, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Rare side effects include: abdominal pain from uterine cramping, seizures and palpitations (only with overdosing). All women in both study arms, including those in the secondary prevention arm who do not receive the study drug, will be asked if they experienced any of these symptoms.

Acceptability of intervention to women72 hours (plus or minus 8 hours) after delivery

A brief exit interview will be conducted with participants to assess their acceptability of the intervention, including tolerability of any side effects experienced.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Deliveries at health sub-centers and homes

🇮🇳

Bijapur, Karnataka, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath